Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create
farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively
inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly
deforested whole regions.
A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States
create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively
inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States
create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers
relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland
(especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive
houses and furniture, but also
D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland
(especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive
houses and furniture, but it also
E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created
farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively
inexpensive houses and furniture, but it
想請問各位前輩 為什麼答案是B 而不是D呢?
我知道B的文法是對的 但是他的句意用not only...but also是不是有點怪
因為一個是好事一個是壞事
D的問題是最後那個it 可能指代到整件事 但前面的單數名詞也是clearing而已
還是說因為A的clearing of forest不能做gave consumers...這個動作所以句意錯誤呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.7.214