作者danyuchn (Javy)
看板GMAT
標題Re: [問題] GWD-6-31
時間Wed Jul 25 20:50:28 2012
※ 引述《la01964344 (辛巴)》之銘言:
: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create
: farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively
: inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly
: deforested whole regions.
: A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States
: create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively
: inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
: B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States
: create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers
: relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
: C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland
: (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive
: houses and furniture, but also
: D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland
: (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive
: houses and furniture, but it also
: E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created
: farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively
: inexpensive houses and furniture, but it
: 想請問各位前輩 為什麼答案是B 而不是D呢?
你的答案來源可能錯了,
這一題是從prep中擷取而來,
官方答案是D。
Ron有回答過關於這題的討論串:
http://tinyurl.com/cbw9ga7
: 我知道B的文法是對的 但是他的句意用not only...but also是不是有點怪
: 因為一個是好事一個是壞事
是的,表達同方向列舉用not only...but (also)
表達轉折的'然而'用but就好
並且create 跟 caused的時態也違反平行原則。
: D的問題是最後那個it 可能指代到整件事 但前面的單數名詞也是clearing而已
: 還是說因為A的clearing of forest不能做gave consumers...這個動作所以句意錯誤呢?
在平行連接的兩個句子裡,it若為其中一句的主詞
則優先指代另一平行句中的主詞。
這是指代的特殊原則。
Dustin
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 1.162.24.117
推 la01964344:喔喔!原來如此 感謝! 07/26 14:52
推 la01964344:那再請教b選項的那兩個動詞之所以不一樣是因為第一句 07/26 14:56
→ la01964344:倒裝 所以即使是這種倒裝而造成的動詞不一致也算是違反 07/26 14:57
→ la01964344:平行結構囉? 07/26 14:57
→ danyuchn:嗯,除了這個之外,逗號後面的句子不能省略主詞it 07/26 15:05