※ 引述《mengann (獅子座女生)》之銘言：
: 65. Digging in sediments in northern China, evidence has
: been gathered by scientists suggesting that complex
: life-forms emerged much earlier than they had previously thought.
: (A) evidence has been gathered by scientists
: suggesting that complex life-forms emerged much earlier than they had
: (B) evidence gathered by scientists suggests a
: much earlier emergence of complex life-forms than had been
: (C) scientists have gathered evidence suggesting
: that complex life-forms emerged much earlier than
: (D) scientists have gathered evidence that suggests
: a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms
: than that which was
: (E) scientists have gathered evidence which
: suggests a much earlier emergence of complex
: life-forms than that
: 這一題我想知道正確答案C選項的suggesting是怎麼來的
: 我可以解釋成scientists have gathered evidence [which suggests] that complex
: life-forms emerged much earlier than…..
名詞後綴Ving就如你所講的沒錯。
: 也就是形容詞子句省略關代變成分詞的用法嗎
: 我只知道evidence接後面的that子句表同位
這裡為甚麼不能用
scientists have gathered evidence that complex life-forms emerged much earlier
than…的原因是，that子句在這裡等同evidence的同位語
(我之前的文章好像有講到that帶領名詞子句的三種用法)
但that子句內並不等於證據本身，而是證據所推導(suggest)的結論
既然不等於證據本身，就不能用同位語用法。
Dustin
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.250.135.113