推 chenemily:謝謝 08/06 19:23
※ 引述《chenemily (天天保持好心情)》之銘言：
: Magazine Publisher: Our magazine does not have a liberal bias. It is true
: that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express
: distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also
: obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position. Clearly,
: however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but
: rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.
: Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the
: cogency of the magazine publisher’s response?
: 想請問這題 不知道我想的對不對 有錯請指正 > <
: 因果:our actions demonstrate-->a commitment to a balanced presentation of
: diverse opinions.
premise：我們拿到一篇保守評論之後，還會再配一篇自由派的評論平衡
conclusion：我們是平衡報導，沒有偏自由派
: A. Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more
: than one review of the book
: 無關比較 刪
橫向[同類]比較的無關 x
: B. Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those
: that it has commissioned
: 無關議題:unsolicited book
沒有提到commissioned/unsolicited x
: C. Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine
: takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to
: obtain further reviews
: 這題大概的意思就是再重複原文的前提 所以如果是的話:支持 否:反駁
使用evaluate/flaw題的「雙向檢測法」
測試雙向是否會造就不同的結果
若c選項為no-先拿到自由派的評論的話就不會再用保守派的評論平衡-偏自由-weaken
yes-不管先拿到哪一派的報導都會等另外一派的報導來平衡-沒偏任一派-support
: D. Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself
: written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view
: 跟書的內容來源無關?? 不是很確定耶
書的內容跟評論的關係 與此題無關 x
: E. Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book
: reviews that the magazine publishes
: 主角:most of the readers錯誤 刪
跟讀者看法無關 x
dustin
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.45.75.73
※ 編輯: danyuchn 來自: 114.45.75.73 (08/06 00:24)