看板 GMAT 關於我們 聯絡資訊
※ 引述《heine564 (築夢踏實)》之銘言: : Because postage rates are rising, Home Decorator magazine plans to maximize : its profits by reducing by one half the number of issues it publishes each : year. The quality of articles, the number of articles published per year, : and the subscription price will not change. Market research shows that : neither subscribers nor advertisers will be lost if the magazine's plan is : instituted. : Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest evidence that the : magazine's profits are likely to decline if the plan is instituted? 注意這邊看似是support,其實是weaken題。(likely to decline) 題目說: 1.郵資上漲,所以雜誌社要砍掉一半發行量來增加利潤(main pt) 2.文章素質、文章數、訂閱價都不會改變 3.(研究顯示)減少發行量後訂戶跟廣告商都不會跑掉。 看完之後先自己想5-10秒,在什麼樣的情況下利潤會減少? 有些人腦子動得比較快可能就想到了:其他的收入如訂閱收入減少或廣告收入會減少 如果還是想不出來缺點的話,直接去看選項吧。 : (A) With the new postage rates, a typical issue under the proposed plan would : cost about one-third more to mail than a typical current issue would. 減少一半發行量等於省'1/2原來的郵資'。 可是A選項告訴你郵資只漲1/3,所以其實你還倒賺!屬support。 X : (B) The majority of the magazine's subscribers are less concerned about a : possible reduction in the quantity of the magazine's articles than about a : possible loss of the current high quality of its articles. 題目都跟你說了(2.)這兩者都不會變動。 X : (C) Many of the magazine's long-time subscribers would continue their : subscriptions even if the subscription price were increased. 就算訂閱費漲了還是會續訂,代表訂閱收入可能會上升,有support的意味。 X : (D) Most of the advertisers that purchase advertising space in the magazine : will continue to spend the same amount on advertising per issue as they have : in the past. 雖然3.說了訂戶跟廣告商"的客戶"都不會跑掉, 這裡指出了廣告商仍然是同一批, 但是這些廣告商願意花在每份發行刊物(per issue)上的廣告費是固定的。 也就是說發行量減少一半,總廣告收入就減少一半。 : (E) Production costs for the magazine are expected to remain stable. 成本穩定並無法導致虧損。 : AND: (D) 不懂為何(A)是support? Dustin -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 1.162.23.21
heine564:A還是不懂 我好笨QQ 09/04 17:31
heine564:漲了1/3 所以profit不是會下降嗎 09/04 17:31
danyuchn:少寄一半雜誌出去不就省了一半郵資嗎 09/04 17:55
heine564:那如果選項是漲超過1/2 是不是代表是虧錢 09/04 18:06
danyuchn:sure 09/04 18:23
heine564:大概懂了 我在想一下吧! 謝囉!!! 09/04 19:16