※ 引述《amysky0205 (=Amy=)》之銘言：
: Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners
: or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school
: nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them
: for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased
: significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s
: schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or
: they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago.
: Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
: A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has
: not decreased over the past ten years.
: B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other
: children to have allergies to other substances.
: C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely
: to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.
: D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses
: and apartment buildings in Renston.
: E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of
: Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.
: 在Renston這個地方的護士回報小朋友有過敏的現象在十年裡增加了
: ------>小朋友暴露在更多chemicals的環境了 OR 比十年前的小朋友更敏感
: 我是使用Negate來看有沒有weaken
: (A) The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools HAS
: DECREASED over the past ten years.
: 護士在過去十年來減少了--> 和小朋友過敏現象增加沒有關係 Irrelevant
: (B) Children who are allergic to the chemicals ARE MORE likely than other
: children to have allergies to other substances.
: --->premise沒有提到關於其他substances的資訊 Irrelevant
: (C) Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals ARE MORE likely to
: be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.
: --->跟十年前比, 現在有過敏現象的小朋友被送到護士那邊的可能性比較高
: (D)The chemicals ARE commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and
: apartment buildings in Renston.
: --->這個不能成立是因為就算cleaners和pesticides在公寓普遍被使用, 如果沒有通知
: 護士的話也不知道小朋友過敏增加了(?)
: (E)Children attending elementary school MAKE UP a larger proportion of
: Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.
: --->小朋友上小學的比例比十年前更多了跟過敏沒有關係 Irrelevant
: OA: C
: 想請問這樣分析思維對嗎? 還有特別想請問(D)選項!!
: 謝謝:)
沒有所謂如何分析"方法" 一定對或不對 只要分析的概念正確都可
我是沒看出妳是如何分析 C 的答案是正確的
不過題目是說 現在過敏而送去醫護室的小孩變多，
所以推原因 1. 現在過敏物變多 or 2. 現在小孩較容易過敏
推原因的 assumption，有一種答案類型就是排出其他原因
(C) - 現在小孩被送去醫護室的可能性不會較高
如果送去醫護室可能性較高，那就變成其他原因了，所以 (C) 排除答案選項
(D) 說 cleaners or pesticides 不會用在 house or apartment
題目不管是 chemicals 或是醫護室 都圍繞在學校
所以 house or apartment 都是 irrelevant
--
Dounts GMAT 資訊小網站: http://ndxica.pixnet.net/blog
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.252.75.104
※ 編輯: dounts 來自: 111.252.75.104 (04/15 11:52)