推 jamestin112:只要有人想競爭 曾經削價的公司就會再削價 05/14 23:15
→ jamestin112:所以那些其他航空公司就不會想要參與競爭了 05/14 23:16
→ jamestin112:個人看法是這樣啦 講得有點不清楚不曉得你能否理解 05/14 23:17
→ antisupreme:thanks 05/16 00:58
15. (25986-!-item-!-188;#058&002914)
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which
they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However,
this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run.
Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup
the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended
period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut
the airline's fares.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(B) Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced
its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new
competitors emerge.
想問(B)選項怎麼weaken？
我的理解是會變成一個循環 降價--->recoup--->競爭者--->降價.....
感覺應該是support賺不到錢...
求指教，謝謝!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 1.162.45.185