看板 Grad-ProbAsk 關於我們 聯絡資訊
(1)Suppose a non-preemptive scheduler uses variable priorities and time quanta as the following table,where the highest priority is 5 Priority Time quantum New priority after New priority after time quantum is expired returning from I/O 5 40 4 5 4 60 3 5 3 100 2 4 2 200 1 4 1 320 1 3 Which of the following statements is "incorrect"? (A)Response time of interactive threads will increase. (B)Priorities of CPU-intensive threads will be lowered. (C)Time-quanta of I/O-bound threads will decrease. (D)None of the above. 我的想法是Response time是第一次回應時間 所以RR的Quantum就是Response time 但優先權2和1的Process變為同樣優先權所以A是錯的 B的話CPU就是和I/O的優先權值相反 這樣對嗎? C的話我就不知道要看哪一個了 (2)另外我想知道有沒有開放式課程是講同步問題的MAILBOX 有點不是很清楚Blocking receive , Non-Blocking receive之類system call的用法 還有分類題庫有看到的serializable transaction問題洪逸好像也沒教過 不知道有沒有網頁講的比較清楚的呢 謝謝各位撥空看我的問題 希望可以獲得解答^^ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.173.254.118 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Grad-ProbAsk/M.1418406439.A.012.html