作者manfale (戰神 吱見愁)
看板KMT
標題英國紐國標準: 2.5 PPM, 歐盟TDI: 0.5mg/kg
時間Tue Sep 30 11:20:25 2008
紐西蘭食品安全局 9/28 公告採取2.5 PPM的標準
http://www.nzfsa.govt.nz/publications/media-releases/2008/
29-sep-melamine-statement.htm
Dr Allen says the level of 5 ppm that NZFSA announced Friday remains as
the trigger for investigation into ingredients used to make food products.
“For infant formula, the level remains set to the current level of test
detection of 1 ppm.
For foods in their final form, other than infant
formula, this level is 2.5 ppm.
“The European Food Safety Authority opinion on the estimated tolerable
daily intake (TDI) of melamine states 0.5 mg/kg bodyweight (ie, for every
kg a person weighs they can safely consume 0.5 mg every day – for a 20 kg
child this is 10 mg; for a 70 kg adult the safe amount is 35 mg).”
This means that it has been considered that
foods containing up to 5 ppm of
melamine do not pose a risk to human health. However, NZFSA has adopted a
higher safety factor than is normally applied in such cases, and has set
the limit of 2.5 ppm before regulatory action is considered.
英國食品局的公告 採取2.5 PPM的下架標準
http://www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/2008/sep/melamine
All products from China containing more than 15% milk as an ingredient, or
products where the percentage of milk content cannot be established, will
be subject to documentary, identity and physical checks, including
laboratory analysis, to determine that any levels of melamine present in
the product do not exceed 2.5 mg/kg.
Those products with more than 2.5mg/kg
will be destroyed.
歐盟的公告 TDI為 0.5mg/Kg
http://www.efsa.eu.int/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1211902098433.htm
EFSA’s scientists today issued a statement saying that if adults in Europe
were to consume chocolates and biscuits containing contaminated milk powder,
they would
not exceed the TDI (Tolerable Daily Intake) of 0.5 mg/kg body
weight, even in worst case scenarios.
事實 就是眼見為憑 看不懂英文的話 我也沒辦法
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 202.39.226.12
→ urban:你的文章裡歐盟是0.5？ 220.128.134.76 09/30 11:29
抱歉 筆誤
※ 編輯: manfale 來自: 202.39.226.12 (09/30 11:34)
推 link123:我覺得很奇怪,像這方面的決議是怎麼來的? 61.216.7.185 09/30 12:27
→ link123:它有經過廠,官,商,學者充分討論嗎? 61.216.7.185 09/30 12:28
→ link123:為什麼說2.5ppm就2.5ppm?人家食品管理法都 61.216.7.185 09/30 12:29
→ link123:是經過2~3年充份的研究討論才訂標準,我們 61.216.7.185 09/30 12:30
→ link123:只因為行政院的一句話?那對之前0ppm有啥公 61.216.7.185 09/30 12:30
→ link123:平,這其實可以去監察院或消基會告發的 61.216.7.185 09/30 12:31
推 rommel1:國際的標準.規範...很多都是互相參考而來 118.168.7.176 09/30 18:56
→ rommel1:...香港開了第一槍...其他國家引用... 118.168.7.176 09/30 18:57
推 urban:既然歐盟是0.5，那大話新聞說的就沒錯 211.74.92.154 09/30 20:59