推 md1011:可是他今年一年約 有上場總比被冷凍好 12/12 23:12
推 fish0112:罷了，反正是一年約，現在也沒球隊想收他吧... 12/13 02:33
推 david319:我覺得現在的尼克,最好不要有變動呀....尤其是交易JJ 12/13 04:10
Nate Robinson, New York Knicks
The Knicks are 4-1 in December and enter Friday's visit to New Orleans on a
three-game win streak that has featured precisely zero minutes for li'l Nate.
So you can safely conclude that, yes, Robinson will soon be eminently
available to interested trade parties … which is why we have him so high
despite the fact that his eligible-to-be-traded date is actually one week
later (Dec. 22) than the rest because he signed later this offseason.
Just don't forget two more important disclaimers.
A. New York will take back only expiring contracts for Robinson, who could
squeeze only a one-year deal worth $4 million out of the Knicks last summer
in spite of his unrivaled popularity at Madison Square Garden. The Knicks'
understandable determination to preserve every ounce of their projected
summer of 2010 cap space cuts down severely on potential trade options.
B. Robinson cannot be traded without his consent as a player on a one-year
deal who will possess full Larry Bird rights with his current team at
season's end. And I'm reliably told that Nate won't waive his veto power to
go just anywhere, even if it means more minutes and shots.
As one Western Conference exec suggested, New York is bound to try to package
Robinson with Eddy Curry or Jared Jeffries -- players whom the Knicks are
truly eager to move -- as opposed to just shopping Robinson on his own.
The safest conclusion, though, is that dealing Robinson is not as easy as it
would seem, even if you're prepared to assume that the Knicks' recent
mini-revival without Robinson is going to continue and that they're fine with
trading him independently of what happens with Curry or Jeffries.
http://tinyurl.com/yd3klx8
可能的做法是連同Curry和Jeffries一起打包
但是不管是打包或單獨兜售Nate
都沒有想像中容易
不過因為Nate符合Larry Bird條款，如果不願被交易可以否決球隊的作為，
因此縱使到別隊可以讓他有更多上場機會與出手數，他不見得會馬上同意
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 87.211.192.128