看板 Knicks 關於我們 聯絡資訊
Jackson, Fisher, Melo triangle taking the shape of a Big L. 禪師、漁總、瓜瓜的失敗的三角戰術 http://tinyurl.com/kuu7yrj 以下節錄重點 想看原文請點連結 "You've got to be patient," one league personnel director said. "You got a coach who’s never coached and a president who's never built a team." 尼克隊必須要保持耐心,因為你的總教練是第一年帶兵, 而你的球隊總裁也沒有親手打造任何一隻球隊的經驗。 Jackson has tough decisions after Dec. 15 benchmark, when all of the league's contracts become tradeable, including Anthony's. Though Jackson would like to make a move to improve the defense, he also isn't eager in taking back a contract that eats into future cap space. 依聯盟規定 12/15 之後,任何球員的合約, 都可以被進行交易 - 包括甜瓜的。 對禪師來說,要不要透過交易球員來補強防守, 但又不能影響盡可能空出來的薪資空間, 這對禪師來說,應該會覺得蠻頭痛的。 Perhaps Aldridge will join the Knicks this summer, but more likely he will stay in Portland, just like center Marc Gasol will stay in Memphis. Why would Aldridge or Gasol accept less money to join a franchise with one of the league's bottom three records? The Post reported Friday the Knicks realize the odds are stacked against them for Gasol. Fans who have started a Twitter hashtag "Lose More for Okafor" should look at a bigger picture. The Knicks need a respectable season to help be a force in free agency. Fisher needs to show he can coach. Anthony needs to show he can be the consummate superstar. The lottery’s ping-pong balls are too fickle to rely on a top-three pick that might or might not yield Duke center Jahil Okafor. 波特蘭拓荒者的 Aldridge 今夏也將成為自由球隊. 是有那麼一點可能他有機會加盟尼克, 不過照情況看來,他還是會選擇留在拓荒者, 就像 Marc Gasol 看來也是會繼續留在灰熊隊一樣。 要 Aldridge 或是 Gasol 拿更少的錢加入一個聯盟倒數的球員, 幾乎是不太可能的事。 有消息指出,尼克已經慢慢明白, 他們要獲得 Marc Gasol 的機會微乎其微。 尼克球迷開始在 twitter 上留言 "Lose More for Okafor". (為了得到 Okafor 輸多一點吧) (註:杜克大學的中鋒 - Jahil Okafor) 但尼克隊本季需要有更好的表現,才能吸引自由球員加盟, 而且冀望在前三名的樂透選秀,實有太憑藉運氣, 到時候也不一定真能夠指名到 Jahil Okafor. Anthony had an interesting remark Friday about why they are able to make these dazzling fourth-quarter comebacks after playing like zombies for three quarters."When you get down, you start playing more freely, without a care, just running and gunning,"Anthony said.That doesn't sound like the complex, structured triangle. The scheme sounded so good in the den in L.A. a year ago. It looks so bad now. 瓜瓜對於星期五對黃蜂的第四節反撲有一個很有趣的註解, 他說:「當比分落後的時候,你就打得比較輕鬆,不太在乎的結果, 就反而會不斷的跑動拿球,然後不斷的投籃並且進球。」 恩? 聽起來他講的戰術並不像有系統又規則的三角戰術阿? 其怪怎麼在 L.A. 執行得很完美的三角,現在在紐約看起來就是一個慘字. ※ 編輯: BleuOmbre (1.165.115.206), 12/08/2014 01:43:49
jerrystarks: 三角能成功的球隊都是8打5(個人看法) 12/08 09:01