Re: [外電] some news...

[sagesrock (separate ways)]

※ 引述《LABOYS (洛城浪子)》之銘言：
: - MJ on Kobe
:    Of course, there's always the comparison of you and Kobe Bryant. Where does
:   Kobe stand in the status of NBA players through history?
:       It's so hard to say. I think he is always going to be within the
:   conversations of some of the greatest players who've played by the time he is
:   finished. Where does he rank among those, if you are talking about positions?
:   If you are talking about guards, I would say he has got to be in the Top 10.
:   MJ:如果你指的是他在後衛上的歷史地位 我覺得KB有前十
:   順帶一提 ESPN去年的排名 KB在SG排在史上第二 僅次於這位放話的


In his book, For The Love of The Game: My Story, Jordan wrote: "There is no
such thing as a perfect basketball player, and I don't believe there is only
one greatest player either. Everyone plays in different eras. I built my
talents on the shoulders of someone else's talent. I believe greatness is an
evolutionary process that changes and evolves era to era. Without Julius
Erving, David Thompson, Walter Davis, and Elgin Baylor there would never have
been a Michael Jordan. I evolved from them."
http://www.nba.com/history/players/jordan_bio.html


    這是目前我最能認同的話。所以其實MJ大概也不會真的想去排誰第一第二第三
之類的，因為他認為這些偉大的球員，是一代傳一代的。這一代的人可能比前一代
厲害，但他們也是站在前一代的肩膀上，才會這麼偉大的。如果沒有第一，那所謂
[前十]，就是一種[大家都很厲害啦]的說法。XD 這[前十]誰第一誰第二誰第三，
我想他大概不會有很清楚的說法。(潛台詞是[我第一，以下隨便啦] :P)

    所以可以請記者不要再問那種蠢問題了嗎? 這種問[誰是老大]的問題實在很討
人厭，好像一隻呆鳥到處要認老大一樣。






--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.249.171.52
※ 編輯: sagesrock       來自: 111.249.171.52       (10/12 03:03)
推 YamagiN:MJ的話也能這樣去想 Kobe已經有資格加入"史上"討論串了
→ YamagiN:目前那些年輕的球星還在"當代"討論串裡奮戰
→ animalspell:MJ說他在學前輩，KB說他在學前輩，能這樣說都是自信了
→ animalspell:畢竟，就算Jabbar是Bynum的恩師，但現在如果Bynum說
→ animalspell:I evolved from Abdul Jabbar，那可屌了...
→ animalspell:所以我覺得MJ這樣講，很謙卑，又很成熟，也有自信