推 lingjj:3.史上單季52+轟裡頭(共31人)14次來自類固醇世代 確定有問10/25 07:19
→ lingjj:題的Bonds、阿肉、馬怪和索沙占10次 04年後只有4次10/25 07:22
推 lingjj:把標準降到50轟 則從10:4變成11:6 還是很懸殊10/25 07:40
推 lingjj:把標準提高到55+轟就更有趣了10/25 07:43
摘錄自一個十年前對用球的研究:
http://steroids-and-baseball.com/changing-baseball.shtml
彈性: Platek and Gregory conducted another series of bounce tests on the pills;
the scientists conducted about 20 drops with each. They found that the average
height of the bounces from the 1995 and 2000 pills, when dropped from a
height of 182 inches, was 83 and 82 inches respectively. None of the pills
from 1963, 1970, and 1989 averaged over 62 inches. The newer pills each
bounced at least 1/3 higher than the older ones.
結構: The URI study showed that baseballs from two well-separated years in the
post-1993 era (1995 and 2000) were very like each other, yet very different
from balls from pre-1993 years; it also showed significant categorical
differences between the older Spalding and newer Rawlings balls. The Penn
State study showed a marked increase in zip from 1977 on. All that agrees
with the stats-indicated and common-sense indicated belief in a big jump when
the ball maker was changed between 1976 and 1977, as well as the belief that
there was a subsequent jump starting in 1993 and in full force in 1994.
很多事情不是只看表面數據加上腦補就可以說明一切的
(看看今年日職打擊降多慘，怎麼沒人懷疑是不是之前禁藥爽爽吃?)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.25.133
推 EVA96:恩! 看不懂 10/25 13:21
噓 externaload:又在腦補了 唉 10/25 13:32
推 AWainwright:還不是靠__球 10/25 13:41
→ pasaword:日職今年真的很誇張... 10/25 13:44
推 bbdirty5566:依你的觀點 這篇好像也是腦補 10/25 13:56
→ PlayStation3:可憐的56。 10/25 14:02
噓 ppoll2:恩恩 10/25 14:06
推 filla:又在__了 10/26 07:54
→ borriss: 因為罷工球迷跑掉太多 <=這才是腦補 10/26 17:14
→ lingjj:你有沒有看本文結論？結論是93年後的球沒啥差別(本文只比到 10/26 22:13
→ lingjj:2000年)但和93年以前的球差別甚大 而我比較的是類固醇世代 10/26 22:15
噓 lingjj:前後 要反駁我說我腦補可以 好歹拿個2003、04年前後的用球 10/26 22:20
→ lingjj:比較文吧!隨便拿一篇英文研究來搞笑喔? 10/26 22:22