[討論] 失投求三振?

[abc12812 ()]

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=20037

Sale's head is swimming around his center of mass throughout the delivery,
and though he finishes with strong posture, the journey into release point is
a rough ride. It begins with a slouched position and continues with a steep
drop-and-drive as Sale lowers the center of gravity after maximum lift. The
head drifts behind the body and toward the first-base side as he enters foot
strike, before the spine snaps back into place in time for release point. The
30-grade balance upsets the left-hander's mechanical repetition, but he often
benefits from late swings on misplaced pitches thanks to a deep release
point, as demonstrated in the above GIF. Sale might be running from the
injury police, but a lack of balance is the biggest threat to his performance
on the field.

意思是說Sale常常可以靠失投球騙打者嗎@@?

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 140.112.25.133
推 kyo40108:沒錯
推 aton602:有壞的好球和好的壞球這兩種實戰經驗
推 sjvious:iffy control & platoon issues ~?
→ sjvious:像經典賽Rodney有一秋失投變速投高了 打者也揮空
→ kuyung:問題是打者不知道投手投出來的是不是失投球阿XD
推 nickyang:no，是說因為他的出手點很怪異所以就算失投打者也會揮棒
推 kee32:差很多的應該看得出來吧?
→ abc12812:但這文句看起來是負面意涵居多吧?
→ kuyung:比如說打者分得出來偏高的速球和變速球(失投)嗎
推 JubeChocobo:如果出棒欲望很高 很準的投手比投不準的好打
→ kuyung:標題是"失投求三振"還是"失投球三振阿"
推 nickyang:我覺得沒什麼負面的意思光就but之後的句意而言
→ nickyang:把thanks to換成because of也沒什麼不可以
推 lukehong:獅頭球三振 這不是之前戰過了嗎?(挖鼻孔)
推 Mutoh:如果有負面的意思，解讀就會很怪。正面的意義，解讀比較順
→ Mutoh:正面意義就是nickyang六樓所說，比較順暢
→ Mutoh:負面...靠失投球???失投球不是一種球種，投手也不會故意
→ Mutoh:失投...所以怎麼靠？
→ Mutoh:該不會kuso...不失投就騙不了打者吧...XDDD
推 kurt28:之前有人這樣講被酸到爆XDDDDDD
推 EE1:老外也懂得賣個破綻啊
推 funlala1102:以前松阪三振人的"魔球"子彈球，不是也說是失投的滑球
推 Alexander13:失投-＞三振=魔球，失投-＞HR=失投…魔球的真相
→ austincold:BM裡面的曲球就很有效(誤)
推 Zuleta:John Farrell也說過松坂的魔球是一種失投的滑球
推 stja:
推 tonyselina:達比修有去年讓主播wow的某球好像也是失投球 XD
→ sneak: 像經典賽Rodney有 https://noxiv.com