[外電] Braun scandal

[blacklittle (傻黑)]

http://tinyurl.com/mrak8bu

Braun scandal reminds us of man whose reputation he ruined

The big names in ESPN's big report are Alex Rodriguez and Ryan Braun. I keep
thinking of another:

最近ESPN報告提到的兩大咖 A-Rod 跟 Braun, 但我想到另一個人

Dino Laurenzi, Jr.

You remember Laurenzi, don't you? The last time you heard his name -- the only
time you heard his name -- was in February 2012, when Braun set Laurenzi's
reputation and character on fire out of personal convenience. It looks more and
more like a despicable act, much worse than whatever Braun did with
performance-enhancing drugs. It looks more and more like Braun peed in a cup,
then relieved himself on Laurenzi.

記得他嗎 2012年2月幫Braun把尿的那位藥檢員 Braun口中毀壞他名聲的人

Laurenzi was a sample collector. A working guy. Anonymous to us. Braun had
tested positive for elevated testosterone shortly after finishing his 2011
season, when he was named National League MVP. Braun appealed his 50-game
suspension and won on a technicality: There was a slight delay between when
he submitted his sample and when it was sent to the lab. Laurenzi had kept it
in his house; the sample had been collected on a Saturday, and he didn't think
it would be shipped until Monday.

Laurenzi 跟我們一樣 只是個領死薪水的上班族

Braun拿到2011 NL MVP (Kemp:....)之後的尿檢沒過 但他不服 而且上訴成功不用禁賽
只因為Laurenzi把他的尿 週末放在他家冰箱 沒有照程序馬上送出

There was no evidence that Laurenzi had tampered with the sample. Braun had a
20-to-1 ratio of testosterone to epitestosterone; a ratio higher than 4-to-1
is considered a positive result. A second test determined that excess
testosterone came from an external source -- i.e., performance-enhancing drugs

沒有證據顯示Laurenzi有動過那瓶尿 而且直上火星的數值都指向Braun*有吃藥

Braun fought the suspension, which was his right, and an arbitrator ruled in
his favor. And this is what he said afterward:
"There were a lot of things that we learned about the collector, about the
collection process, about the way that the entire thing worked, that made us
very concerned and very suspicious about what could have actually happened."

Braun: 千錯萬錯 都是藥檢員They的錯

A lot of things? He didn't name them. He just smeared a man who was merely
doing his job. Laurenzi, a Wisconsin resident, had all of a sudden been tabbed
as a guy who got one of the state's marquee athletes in trouble. Try living
with that.

千錯萬錯? Braun抹黑了盡忠職守的藥檢員

Now comes the ESPN report that Major League Baseball is looking to suspend
Braun for 100 games -- 50 for whatever he got from the Biogenesis "wellness"
clinic, and 50 for denying he used PEDs.

皇天不負苦心人 啊不是 是法網恢恢 疏而不漏 不是不報 時候未到
Braun 可能要被禁賽100場

So, what do you think, everybody? Do you think Dino Laurenzi Jr. intentionally
sabotaged Ryan Braun -- and did it so well that even Braun couldn't produce any
evidence of it? Or do you think that maybe an elite ballplayer used
performance-enhancing drugs?

你還覺得Laurenzi故意栽贓給Braun嗎? 還是你覺得他有用藥呢?

And how would you feel if you were Laurenzi now? Over the past year, Laurenzi
has declined my interview requests. But you can be sure he is watching.

如果你是Laurenzi 你會怎麼想呢?
雖然這幾年他都拒絕受訪 但他現在正在看

Braun is entitled to defend himself again. That will be difficult this time.
According to ESPN, drug-supplier Tony Bosch will testify against him; last
time, Braun was only fighting a test. And the public probably won't want to
hear Braun's defense now. You can sell people on one botched drug sample, but
another accusation a year later kills your credibility. But again, Braun
deserves to be heard.

Braun這次一樣在辯護 不過應該比上次困難
Bosch的報告比上次的尿還猛

If he is guilty of steroid use, I understand why he did it. There was a ton of
money at stake, he was driven to be great, and he could rationalize that the
drugs were illegal but not harmful, or that they helped him heal but not
produce, or that everybody was doing it -- the human mind can convince itself
of almost anything.

如果證明Braun是Braun* 我能理解啦 畢竟錢跟表現成正比

I would like to believe -- I do believe -- that if I were a professional
athlete, I would stay far away from PEDs. I've never been into drugs, unless
you count beer or dark chocolate, but more importantly, I think I would object
to using PEDs on moral grounds. But I do understand why some athletes use
banned substances. Ambition breeds mistakes. It happens.


What I do not understand is destroying the reputation of a man who did nothing
to you. And if Braun is guilty now, and was really guilty last time, then that
is what he did. Dino Laurenzi Jr. deserved better than that. I hope you
remember him. I hope Ryan Braun does, too.


Braun: 乾爹 救我
Kemp: 我的MVP 一去不復返...


--
blacklittle  3B  1B
這傢伙
在他的生涯中 有機會成為不錯的邊角內野手
但須克服脆弱的身體 避免成為DL常客
他仍有空間提升他平庸的打擊爆發力
但仍舊無法造成全壘打威脅

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 114.42.211.65
推 sezna:MVP*
推 best2008:艾 嘆氣!!
推 Mooooose:龍五:拿斧頭來!
推 maikxz:恭喜賀喜
→ DesertEagleX:soab
推 Seiran:*
推 ChrisDavis:這人真的很雖，因為程序上瑕疵被搞到這樣
推 RyanBraun:...
噓 goldenwind:噓樓上
推 yeng1217:哈哈你看看你
推 waiani:Bosch的報告比上次的尿還猛 XDDDDDDDDD
推 chougham:為什麼上次不馬上請他再尿一次來驗呀~?
推 davidex:Braun:有種給我一刀斃命
推 pathfinder:教主:抓阿肉祭旗就好，反正他人緣也不好。要救乾兒子!
推 Ktime:@chougham 藥檢次隨機抽樣，時間不固定，如果真有吃藥
→ Ktime:又加上時間點 相近，才有可能檢驗出來。如果裝死 那幾個禮拜
→ Ktime:甚至幾個月不吃，你還能抓到Braun的證據嗎?
推 immortalqq:乾爹魂在MLB也要出現了嗎?
推 Xenogamer:恭喜榮登**一族
推 whalelover:Braun:Uncle救我
推 mjonask:*
推 DerekHolland:這次MLB乾爹會像屎疼一樣  一手扭轉戰局嗎?
推 janhow:Braun:Uncle save me
推 JBKsucks:一堆看板球星，誰敢禁賽100場？票房不要了嗎？
推 whj0530:不是不報時候未到
推 skyer1042:禁藥球星聯盟不做出相應處分才是真的傷害票房.....
推 WLR:這年頭驗出來就禁吧，管他多大咖
推 ELF004:重點是名單近幾年除了這位都沒被驗到  要禁師出無名
推 maikxz:2000年後那波風暴就是當初工會跟聖教主拒絕引入藥檢導致
→ maikxz:當初只是時候未到 還想再重演一次嗎 lol
推 ELF004:聖教主現在就是自己桶的樓子  要抓幾個巨星變成歷史罪人來
→ ELF004:替她收拾
推 p86506:簽名檔是MVP玩太多喔XD
推 cena0605:連乾爹都出現了 MLB板要NBA板化了嗎XD
推 elong:寫得太過分了吧 那次是用不符規定程序 不是說他栽贓
推 Uncontinue:BB可以默契封殺 這次再用同樣標準啊
推 CGary:這次是要改為默契封殺掉藥檢結果? XD
→ CGary:@elong: 那時候 Braun 的確非常露骨的暗示檢測員栽贓他...
推 Y1999:阿肉一定會被血祭，就看乾兒子了