→ BBMak:我想中共正在補資本主義一課吧 推 203.67.95.175 08/20
※ 引述《poe (閉關中請暫勿打擾)》之銘言：
: ※ 引述《ManicD (討厭溫哥華的雨季)》之銘言：
: : Simply the fact that a Marxist communism requires an infrastructure provided
: : by capitalism.
: But consider the fact that Marx never thought of any kind of
: "socialism in one country." What we are dealing with is a
: capitalist world system, so don't apply the mechanical "stages
: of human development" to a specific country or region.
: : Marx's prediction of revolution was in the industrialized Europe.
: We are talking about Marxism (or more specifically, classical
: Marxism), so we'd better leave aside Marx's wrong prediction
: (or put it under another topic) and at least take into account
: Lenin and Trotsky's theories of revolution (e.g. "the combined
: and uneven development" of the backward countries), which are
: none the less based on Marx's insights.
The original statement was that China is on the opposite end of Marxism.
I may not call it a total opposite (the statement above wasn't made by me),
however, I would agree that by taking socialist measures anywhere out of the
context of the industrialized Europe of 19th century, calling anything Marxist
would be a false statement. Therefore, to say that China is not in any
relevant way reflecting Marxism (as in Marx's thoughts in and of itself) is
a fair statement.
China may be implementing what I may call "Market Stalinism", but far from
classical Marxism.
My definition of Marxism is simply Marx's thoughts per se.
Revolutionary greetings!
--
At risk of seemingly ridiculous,
let me say that the true revolutionary
is guided by a great feeling of love.
-Che Guevara-
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw)
◆ From: 24.87.207.19