[轉錄][外絮] Mavericks Want a Do-Over With Rocket …

[ISnathan (我會一輩子愛著你的 小su)]

※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板]

作者: pttQQQ (pttQQQ) 看板: NBA
標題: [外絮] Mavericks Want a Do-Over With Rockets, File Protest
時間: Sun Dec 20 12:46:43 2009



 Mavericks Want a Do-Over With Rockets, File Protest

 小牛:我要提起比賽無效之訴! 叭～～～～～～

 The Mavericks lost a thriller to Houston last night, and owner Mark Cuban is
 not happy about it. But unlike most teams, who eventually accept defeat and
 perhaps rip a referee or two in the media, the Mavericks won't let this one
 die: ESPN's Marc Stein report the Mavericks will file a protest with the NBA
 to have a portion of the game replayed.

 今天輸給火箭之後,小牛老闆庫班很不爽.
 若是其他球隊的話,可能就認了,頂多跟媒體嘴砲個兩句嗆嗆裁判.
 但～他可是庫班阿,他可不會輕易認輸,他決定要跟NBA提起比賽無效之訴(破音).
 要求重打比賽的大約最後一分鐘!

 The call at the crux of this protest is ... an improper video review? Cuban
 tells Stein that when Rockets guard Aaron Brooks was called for a Flagrant 1
 in overtime, the referees reviewed when league rules state that only
 Flagrant 2s are subject to review. The real issue is that when they reviewed
 the tape, the referees decided Dallas center Erick Dampier deserved a
 technical foul for a seemingly intentional elbow tossed Brooks's way.
 Dampier already had one tech, so he got booted with a minute left in overtime
 and the Mavericks down five. (The call also allowed the Rockets to choose a
 non-Dampier Maverick to shoot his free throws -- which might actually have
 been good for Dallas -- and Brooks did hit the free throw resulting from
 Damp's tech.)

 而他抗議的點在於--不適當的影片複審.
 當時的情形是:在OT約最後一分鐘時,裁判吹了一次小AB對蛋皮的一級惡意犯規.
 並且再觀看影片以確定這個一級惡意犯規有沒有可能改判成二級惡意犯規.(結果沒有)

 但是在觀看影片之後,裁判加判了蛋皮一個T,而因為蛋皮之前已經有一個T在身,
 蛋皮也因此被罰下場,並且讓小AB得到多罰進一球的機會.
 另外這也讓火箭能任選一個蛋皮以外的球員,來代替他罰球.
 (雖然實際上這對小牛來說可能算是好消息)

 但聯盟規定,只有在想確認一級惡意犯規是否可能成為二級惡意犯規時,才能做影片複查.
 (補充(我猜的):因此庫班想抗議裁判不能在影片複查的時候,多判蛋皮這個T)

 Cuban has two other, ahem, "misapplications of the rules," which is Stu
 Jackson for "bad calls." I sense an ulterior motive, though. Dirk Nowitzki,
 talisman of Dallas, left in the first quarter with an injury we will refer
 to as "Carl Landry's teeth in his elbow." Dirk didn't return. Presumably,
 however, in a replay of the final minute of overtime in, say, March,
 Nowitzki would be available for re-entry. A 4- or 5-point deficit with a
 minute, the ball and Dirk Nowitzki? That's a result that could change. Cuban
 knows what he's doing, though I doubt the league will grant a replay
 considering the referees -- no matter how they got there -- ended up making
 the appropriate call on Dampier.

 "嗯哼~ 規則引用錯誤,這根本就亂判",庫班眉頭一皺,覺得案情並不單純.
 此外,庫班另一個如意算盤打的是,
 牛魔王德佬在這場比賽第一節就因使用了闇奧義"崩齒肘"後,慘遭反噬而下場.
 如果到時候假設在明年三月左右重新打這最後約一分鐘的比賽,
 那時場上可是會有司機在裡面的,最後一分鐘,落後個4~5分,有德佬在OK的!
 庫班可是精明的很,但聯盟有可能接受這個這個抗議嗎?
 尤其這個抗議是在質疑裁判大人們,並且事實上最後對蛋皮的這個判決是合理的.

 The NBA had its first do-over in decades in the 2008 season, when Shaquille
 O'Neal (then with Miami) was wrongly disqualified on his fifth foul, which
 referees believed to be his sixth. The Heat and Hawks got together later in
 the season to replay 51.9 seconds, despite the fact Shaq had been traded to
 Phoenix and both teams had several new players. Hilariously, no points were
 scored in the replayed 51.9 seconds, and the Hawks won, as they did in the
 original game.

 NBA數十年來只有在2008有第一次重打比賽的紀錄,主角是還在熱火的歐肥.
 當時裁判記錯他的犯規數,在實際上只有五犯的時候記成六犯畢業,將他趕下場.
 熱火和老鷹在之後重新打了那場比賽的最後51.9秒.
 但事實上在那個時候,歐肥卻已經被交易到了太陽,而兩隊也換了不少新成員.
 有趣的是,在重打的51.9秒中,兩隊沒有得到任何分數,比賽也維持原先的結果,
 由老鷹隊取得勝利.

 資料來源:http://0rz.tw/rNlUW  NBA Fanhouse
     作者:Tom Ziller

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 211.74.53.21
推 jlcsn       :喔喔~那場我有印象XD
推 Kshatri     :牛魔王XD
推 M0NENE5566  :這場小牛T超多的 主場劣勢
推 ggne        :闇奧義-崩齒肘
→ Kreen       :蠻屌的，小牛老闆揪甘心～
推 dpogcnn     :印象中熱火因此一天輸了兩場 進度趕很兇...
推 ISnathan    :借轉 感恩!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 123.195.174.43
推 imkidding   :還是老闆帶種ˋˊ
推 dfr314      :喜歡小牛就是因為有這種老闆  很挺自己的球員!!!
→ dfr314      :更何況  本來就是殘判亂來= =
推 JOHNJJ      :沒看比賽 但是司機受傷很難過><" 小牛要加油呀!
→ YHJ         :昨天裁判穿到整場都在噓他~ XD  我差不多每場都會看