[外電] FISH:Brendan Haywood's Flop Must Stop

[LKN555 (不在喔)]

上一篇大家在討論黑霧

剛好有外電就翻了~

I'd decided to retire my distaste with Big Wood’s late-last-season “I just
work here" declaration for a few reasons. Hey, maybe it’s been taken a
bit out of context. Or, hey, maybe he had a right to subtly express his
playing-time unhappiness. And heck, it’s a new season worthy of a fresh
start.

(作者決定拋棄他對黑霧上季後半段所發表的"我只是在這工作"所感到的厭惡
這件事已經過了一段時間，而且黑霧也有權表達上場時間的不滿，
另外這是個值得期待的新球季)


Most of all: The Mavs had enough faith in him to keep him while promising him
this year’s starting center job … to acquire “Starter 1A’’ Tyson
Chandler without expressed concerns about Haywood’s fragile psyche … and to
broadcast for all to hear how “elite’’ deep Dallas now is at the center
position.

(原本小牛隊黑霧有足夠的信心並承諾他會是這一季的先發中鋒...
但當小牛得到拳王時...
無疑是害怕黑霧那脆弱的...心靈...
此外，現在大家都說小牛隊在中鋒這個位置上是很堅強的!)

But my “I just work here’’ cynicism is mushrooming back. Its fertilizer is
the substandard performance of Haywood through two weeks of the NBA season.

(在開季兩個星期後，黑霧那不合格的表現...
"I just work here"的言論，聽起來就像個笑話...)

Fact: Dallas has played five games. In four of those games, Haywood has
scored two points or fewer.

(事實上，小牛隊已經打了五場球，
黑霧有上場的比賽只得了兩分或更少...)

You won’t find Mavs staffers saying much about this on the record. Big Wood
needs to be handled properly. The investment in him is sizeable (a guaranteed
five years and $41.745 million, and a possible sixth year at $10.5 million
more). The plan is for him to be here long-term, to fulfill the words we all
uttered about him last spring:

(小牛隊全隊上下沒有人對於這個記錄談論過多...
黑霧需要被嚴格的控管，因為對於他的投資是相當大的...
這約是為了讓他長期的留在達拉斯，去實現去年春天我們所說的....)

“The Best Center The Mavs Have Ever Had.’’

("小牛隊史上最棒的中鋒"
..........................)

Let me get to the money first. And then we’ll get to the damning stats.

(先給我錢，然後你們會看到可怕的數據!!!!)


Haywood’s deal over six years averages $8.3 mil per season (including that
insta-expiring sixth year that benefits the Mavs). This season, he’ll made
$6.9 mil. (Here is the detailed breakdown, as first reported by
DallasBasketball.com’s David Lord: 2010-11 $6,900,000; 2011-12 $7,624,500;
2012-13 $8,349,000; 2013-14 $9,073,500; 2014-15 $9,798,000; 2015-16
unguaranteed and a trade chip of $10,522,500.)
Is that too much for a top-10 center? Nope.

(黑霧的合約超過六年，平均薪資達到8.3M
這對於一個聯盟前10的中鋒，會太貴嗎???
一點都不!!!)

Is that a contract that invites buyer’s remorse if Big Wood is going to
score two points a game in four out of every five outings? Damn straight.

(當Cuban看到黑霧的數據會不會感到自責咧???
真是個糟透的決定...)

Haywood arrived in Dallas last February as if he was ecstatic to have escaped
Washington. His half-season in Dallas -- a PER of 16.1, a 56.4 shooting
percentage, 10.1 rebounds/36, a team-best 2.8 blocks/36, a lack of sloppiness
with 1.6 turnovers/36 – merited the positive talk and the attractive
contract.

(黑霧在二月時，欣喜若狂的離開華盛頓
去年留下的數據是每場16.1分　五成六四的投籃命中率
10.1個籃板　全隊最佳的2.8個火鍋以及1.6個失誤
理所當然得讓他在談新合約時十分順利...)

But let me dig up what I wrote about Brendan in training camp:

(容許我找出我在訓練營時對於黑霧的評論)

Why do some of those numbers feel fluky?

(為什麼那些數據看起來有點靠運氣???)

Is it because Haywood is sort of an odd bird … what an old-time coach might
critically call a “Good-Time Charlie’’? Is it because he seems kind of
sensitive, in need of a bone thrown, in need of a hug?

(這是因為黑霧是種怪鳥嗎?
還是因為他的多愁善感，需要大家的擁抱咧?)

Right now, though, it’s not about what the Mavs need to give Haywood; it’s
a Kennedyesque “what Haywood can do for the Mavs.’’

現在要討論的不是小牛隊需要給黑霧什麼
而是
小牛隊什麼改變?)

Take away the effort against the Clippers (six rebounds, 10 points and three
blocks) and here’s what you’re getting out of Big Wood:

Against Charlotte: three rebounds and two points

Against Memphis, four rebounds and zero points

Against Denver, four rebounds and two points

Against Denver again, seven rebounds and zero points

黑霧今年慘不忍睹的數據

Listen, I can appreciate and even champion a center who “does the little
things’’; DallasBasketball.com did it for a half-decade of Erick Dampier
screen-setting. But for Haywood, that’s four games … games against teams
missing big men like Zach Randolph, Chris Andersen, Kenyon Martin and Nene …
 games in which fate and fortune invited Big Wood to thrive …

(聽著我能接受並且支持"做一些事情的中鋒"就像蛋皮....

但黑霧在這四場比賽...
根本沒有遇到什麼大個子...
彷彿就是要讓黑霧刷數據的....)

And he barely even showed up.

(而他就只負責走上球場...)

Like I say, the Mavericks right now have so many problems that you could
throw a dart – drunk and blind-folded – and pinpoint one worthy of
dissection. Part of Brendan’s ineffectiveness can certainly be tied to the
adjustment he’s making while being outplayed by Chandler, who has stolen his
starting job. (Worth noting: The two of them seem to be competitive in
practice but very friendly with each other as well.) I hasten to point out
that after Dallas’ win at the Clippers, I went on the FS Southwest postgame
show and praised Haywood for hustling through the game, once by flopping to
the floor for a loose ball.

(就像我所說的一樣，
目前小牛隊的問題多到可以用射飛鏢來決定要解決哪個問題，
對於黑霧的無用...
可能是因為他在競爭先發位置上
被拳王給解決了...
我曾在對快艇的勝利之後
讚美黑霧在球場上的拼勁~~~)

That’s the kind of “flop’’ Dallas needs out of Brendan Haywood, the
one-game good flop … not the four-game bad one.

(那樣的演出是達拉斯需要黑霧所做的
在場上一次又一次的展現拼勁
而不是這四場比賽的表現...)

http://0rz.tw/VPE2e

黑霧加油!!!

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.127.140.2
推 dx781020    :如果老大可以重回3號，黑霧+拳王應該就禁區無敵了XD
推 KidNo5      :前面是說 黑物曾說他要改變"I JUST WORK There"習性
→ KidNo5      :但這四場比賽 那種"只是在這裡工作"的習性似乎又出現
喔喔謝謝!!!!
※ 編輯: LKN555          來自: 59.127.140.2         (11/10 00:20)
→ popstarkirby:Haywood+Chandler的進攻應該會超慘
推 KidNo5      :不對 看錯了@@ 第一段應該是說黑物上季有說他"just
→ KidNo5      :work here 作者本想不要去討厭黑物這個發言
→ popstarkirby:這篇作者決定拋棄他對Haywood上上季發表的"我只是在
→ KidNo5      :但這一季的兩個星期黑物的表現又提醒他這件事
→ popstarkirby:這裡工作的言論"的厭惡。作者認為這些東西有點舊了
→ popstarkirby:然後他有權表達對自己上場時間的不滿。另外這是一個
→ popstarkirby:新的球季。根據現有資訊，Haywood過去曾抱怨自己上場
→ popstarkirby:時間不足，然後發表"我只是在這工作"的言論
推 KidNo5      :是上上季喔? 不是上一季的後期?
→ popstarkirby:上季末期，看錯字
感謝大家!!!!

推 wind91      :沒辦法叫Dirk去打3號的= =  會被對方過到死吧?!
推 KidNo5      :去年黑物剛來我曾驚艷於黑物帶來的防守 但是這個防守
→ KidNo5      :好像只持續到蛋皮拿回先發@@
推 liupon      :現在聯盟應該沒有任何一個教練會想把Dirk丟3號
→ dx781020    :我的意思是如果老大能重回當初打3號的身手，這樣就能
→ dx781020    :把黑霧和拳王一起先發
→ popstarkirby:Stevenson+Haywood+Chandler先發不知道能不能得15分
推 KidNo5      :這樣的話那吸管哥跟馬利安怎麼辦....
推 dx781020    :我的那種陣容嗎?
推 KidNo5      :黑阿
→ liupon      :不是很懂何謂打3號的身手，難道Dirk現在打的比3號時
→ liupon      :還差嗎？另外真的不敢想像Haywood+Tyson先發
推 dx781020    :ㄜ...先回答K大的問題：吸管哥打先發2號，馬力安打替
推 wind91      :Kidd+Stevenson+Haywood+Chandler...想像一下......
→ dx781020    :補3號，黑霧拳王有犯規麻煩或一些情況就老大回4號，
→ dx781020    :然後馬力安補3號，留黑霧或拳王打5號
→ dx781020    :然後L大你誤會我說的，我的意思是如果老大能像3號一
推 liupon      :不是很想看到先發五人有三人沒有單獨進攻能力，另外
→ liupon      :Butler上季打2號真的打很爛......。
→ dx781020    :樣靈活等等之類的，這樣就可以把黑霧拉上來打先發，
→ dx781020    :就不會覺得黑霧打替補浪費之類的...
→ popstarkirby:你把兩個中鋒放先發的目的是什麼@@...
→ liupon      :呃...你何時產生了Dirk有和3號球員一樣靈活性的錯覺
推 KidNo5      :說實話 我覺得這樣會很慘.....XD
→ liupon      :就算Dirk當年在老尼手下打3號，也不若一般3號靈活。
→ dx781020    :我說如果能像=.=
推 liupon      :可是你剛剛說重回耶....！= =
→ dx781020    :擺2個中鋒只是不想讓黑霧浪費掉，當然前題是其他位子
→ liupon      :沒有教練會為了不浪費Haywood影響2.3.4號正常調度吧
→ dx781020    :不會有太大影響
→ popstarkirby:球隊調度是以最大效益為前題，這應該不是理由吧!
→ dx781020    :所以我補了前提是其他位子不會有太大影響
→ popstarkirby:也有可能給他掛先發但只打5分鐘呀
→ liupon      :可是你這樣排的陣容對其他位置就已經完全影響了！@@
推 wind91      :Dirk打4號位這一點是不可能改變的
推 KidNo5      :兩個中鋒滿有創意的 但我覺得這兩個很難一起擺上去
推 picaro      :提醒一下 看討論很營養 可是要注意一下推文數喔!
→ picaro      :不如用回的? 只是希望不要有大爭執就好= =  QQ
→ wind91      :所以小牛隊不可能放兩隻中鋒同時在場上的
→ dx781020    :L大SORRY重回我口誤> <
→ picaro      :樓上已經在這篇十五個推文了喔~別再推了~會被水桶!
→ dx781020    :只希望卡萊爾能給黑霧多點上場時間不然他好可憐><
→ picaro      :雖然版主不知道會不會抓這種良性討論~不過畢竟是版規
→ dx781020    :抱歉~我就習慣按了=.= SORRY
推 liupon      :結果還是超過了....
→ picaro      :對......囧~~希望版主網開一面XD
→ dx781020    :公平起見桶我吧=.=誰叫我白目
推 picaro      :那先給你拍拍吧= =|||
推 hintfox     :兩中鋒在場上  內防應該很威  外防就看隊伍了
推 wind91      :內防很威,外防看其他人,進攻Dirk一個打五個XD
推 banbantone  :好中鋒太多也是一種煩惱(抓頭)
※ 編輯: LKN555          來自: 59.127.140.2         (11/10 07:50)