看板 Mavericks 關於我們 聯絡資訊
※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板 #1Dx6o-hX ] 作者: ripmelo (猿猴兄) 看板: NBA 標題: [外絮] Mario Chalmers, and the buzzer beater that shouldn’t ha 時間: Mon Jun 6 13:59:20 2011 The Dallas Mavericks and their fans can point to quite a few reasons for the team's two-point, 88-86 loss to the Miami Heat in Game 3 of the NBA Finals. The team missed five free throws, shot 40 percent, turned the ball over 18 times, and clanged a series of solid three-point looks down the stretch. But Miami guard Mario Chalmers'(notes) buzzer-beating three to end the first quarter, one that should have been disallowed as Chalmers' foot was technically in the back court as he caught the ball, will sting the hardest. The half court stripe is considered part of the back court, and the referees missed the fact that Chalmers had his heel on the line when he took the pass from Udonis Haslem(notes) in the front court. The rule is that you must be considered fully in the front court before you can receive a pass from the front court, and Chalmers' foot was still in the back court when he caught the ball. That's a lot of "courts" to consider, but all Mavs fans will look at is that two-point deficit on the scoreboard as the final buzzer sounded, while ruing the three-points that shouldn't have counted. Of course, had Dirk Nowitzki(notes) not missed two shots down the stretch of the fourth quarter, kept the ball instead of dishing off for a Jason Terry(notes) miss, and not gotten caught up in a Haslem screen that allowed Chris Bosh(notes) to hit the eventual game-winner, nobody will remember this. Such are the vicissitudes of an incredibly close game. http://ppt.cc/aTNW 內有影片 簡單來說 Chalmers 的那球大號三分是違例的 他是在後場接到Haslem 從前場傳來的球 而裁判沒吹 ------------------------------------------------------------- 最後小牛只輸兩分! 嘔死!! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 27.19.201.95 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 27.19.201.95
sanson1100 :也沒什麼好嘔的...裁判在其他地方也彌補這個誤判了 06/06 14:03
uglyduck92 :推一樓.. 06/06 14:04
uglyduck92 :你PO這篇去總板根本是自殺 06/06 14:06
nowismallki :這球感覺沒差啦~~小牛後面一狗票的空檔多進一兩個 06/06 14:10
nowismallki :結局或許就不一樣了~ 06/06 14:10
tloto510 :http://tinyurl.com/3tx2fq3 應該沒有違例喔... 06/06 14:12
tloto510 :踩中線起跳 然後才接到球 06/06 14:12
nowismallki :樓上~這樣是違例!!身體又沒過半場... 06/06 14:13
mikado67 :應該是沒有違例 06/06 14:13
kusokong :我記得這跟踩不踩線有關 跟身體無關吧 06/06 14:20
kusokong :大家要記得 總冠軍戰要贏四場才贏 比賽還沒結束呢 06/06 14:22
a34567 :那些miss掉的 多進兩球不就贏了 06/06 14:28
kurtsun :跳起來應該就沒問題了吧? 06/06 14:29
kusokong :現在只不過是要在接下來的比賽打出3-2就贏惹 06/06 14:30
big920162 :打出3-2 不是4-4嗎? 06/06 14:35
ChanningFrye:這場比賽 我看了下半場 很多奇怪的判決 ... 06/06 14:37
kusokong :XDDDD我算錯了 06/06 14:37
ChanningFrye:打四比四? 06/06 14:41
bob4758 :裁判在其他地方補回來了是真的....而且補很多.... 06/06 14:48
ripmelo :印象中規則是雙腳要過線賽算到前場(帶球的話則是還要 06/06 15:07
ripmelo :加上球) 06/06 15:07
leoliu0812 :◢▆▅▄▃小牛輸了╰(〒皿〒)╯我崩潰了▃▄▅▇◣ 06/06 15:19
Dsman :這球真的沒差拉 ... 自己打比較爛 06/06 15:23
jww :一定是違例。任何一隻腳沒有踏到另一個半場,都還是 06/06 15:24
jww :後場的一部份 06/06 15:24
dmdjjj :踩到線上之後跳起來接球,但是接球前最後一刻腳在地 06/06 15:25
dmdjjj :板上時是踩在線上,因此是以接球前在地板上的最後那 06/06 15:25
dmdjjj :個當下來決定,所以是違例。就像踩在邊線上後跳起來 06/06 15:26
dmdjjj :救界外球一樣是會被吹踩線。不過無所謂了!輸就是輸 06/06 15:26
dmdjjj :今天裁判也幫我們很多 06/06 15:26
yugowolf :希望這一敗讓大家繃緊神經 對於失誤方面更加注意 06/06 15:37
yugowolf :也不要再搞大比分落後苦苦追趕的戲碼了 06/06 15:38
KingSteven :我覺得輸了怪這球很無聊,畢竟裁判今天幫超大 06/06 15:55
kobeismydad :明明就沒有違例 判斷有沒有過中場是看腳有沒有碰到 06/06 16:28
kobeismydad :前場 他碰到了 所以他到前場了 OK? 06/06 16:29
kobeismydad :不然你下次打球 故意把腳踩在中線 在把球往回運往後 06/06 16:29
kobeismydad :場 看你會不會被吹 06/06 16:29
JYHong :要怪怎不去怪jjb那段時間一直敗球 他沒失誤哪來絕殺 06/06 16:41
n924127 :唉 想到要回邁阿密就沒信心 06/06 17:59
SKnight :就想成在客場封王吧 還是可以有點信心 06/06 18:05
guitardirk :Dirk一定認為好好打下一場 不要去想要回邁阿密..... 06/06 18:10
Dsman :先把剩下的兩場主場拿下來吧 再輸一場大概就掰了 06/06 21:43
REXDJ :下面兩場主場都穩穩拿下來 才有資格想奪冠啊... 06/06 23:27
b9307108 :守住剩下的主場 就聽牌了 06/07 15:49