2.
Intelligence:
This can be linked to the first claim.
To prove the legality of OPS for the reason that OPS’ operation can be linked to the intelligence.
Also,to argue that if Applicant State was a “failed country.”
3.
State Responsibility
(Can be used in the first and third claims)
4.
Trial in absentia:
Point:Due process?Beyond reasonable doubt?Wrongfully convicted?
(The whole trial was beyond international law and international human rights law)
To decide whether the respondent state was entitled under international law or international human rights convetions to give protection or asylum?
5.
Lastly,to prove the existence of customary international law and the relations between the treaties and customs if the party did not sign the treaties.
That is,to make sure that this treaty is codification treaty,and after state practicing,becomes international customary law and thus has the binding force upon all states.
(Please check the 1969 North sea continental Shelf Case.Very important!!)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.119.141.60