作者Phater (肥特)
看板NFL
標題[NCAA] 一些有關NCAA的消息
時間Sat Feb 13 02:57:24 2010
前言: 剛剛忙完為期四個月的案子,就算接下來五六個禮拜都當廢人我想我本季
的考績也會過關. 現在沒事無聊就上來發發廢文吧.
=========================================================================
首先,NCAA的規則委員會又有新花樣:
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4907531
NCAA想要對得分後過度慶祝和挑釁的行為加重處分. 如果通過的話,將從2011年開始,
如果在達陣前球員就開始慶祝的話,達陣將不算,而且從開始慶祝的地方開始罰向後
15碼. 如果在達陣區裡犯規的話,將會從加踢,2-pt coversion,或是下一次開球的地方
開始罰15碼.
同時,NCAA也跟NFL一樣,把有腦震盪的球員能上場的可能性減小. 希望能遏止球員們
帶傷上場的頻率. 其他的規則變動還有:
-- 樓上教練席裡將開始准許使用閉路監視器. 主場球隊必須確保主客兩隊的教練們有
同樣的收訊能力.
--禁止球員們在眼下的反光貼布上寫任何東西 (Tim Tebow: 老子畢業了,你咬我啊)
--不再要求球員球褲必須過膝 (奇怪了,籃球員褲子越來越長,足球員褲子越來越短?)
--跟NFL一樣,不准球隊在開球或棄踢回跑時採用箭頭陣衝鋒
--建議所有學校,在開場前60分鐘熱身時在場中採用相隔10碼的中立區,避免兩隊球
員起衝突.
========================================================================
下面的是我從ESPN上面的blog看到,Pac-10跟Big-10有意從Big-12挖角學校.
有可能被挖的學校是Colorado, Missouri跟Texas (!!??). 除此之外,Pac-10有在跟
BYU和Utah接頭轉會的可能性. 當然啦,就算有真的事情發生也不會在一兩年內有結果.
Is Big 12 an endangered species?
ESPN.com's Tim Griffin writes that the Big 12 has to be very cautious --
and very aware -- of the machinations going on to either geographic side,
in the Big Ten and the Pac-10. Missouri is seen as a leading candidate to
join the Big Ten, and Colorado has been mentioned as a target for the Pac-10.
If those two defections happen, and Nebraska and/or Iowa State (two other
Big Ten candidates) also leave, the Big 12 could be decimated. The best it
might do would be to partially reconstitute the old Southwest Conference
by grabbing TCU and Houston, and obviously those two were left out when the
Big 12 was formed for a reason. Would Rice or SMU also be welcomed back into
the fold? Would Tulsa be a possibility? None, obviously, is terribly appetizing.
Moreover, would Texas and Oklahoma, the Big 12's powers, want to jump ship?
Or would they be content with essentially one obstacle each year to a BCS
game? UT is mentioned as a long-shot target of both the Big Ten and the
Pac-10, and certainly it's hard to imagine either conference turning down Oklahoma.
Adam Rittenberg: "I think the decision here ultimately rests with Texas,
which wants to maintain its rivalries with Texas A&M and Oklahoma and make
smart financial choices. Texas would have to weigh the increased revenue it
would get from the Big Ten against the increased travel costs for playing
in the league."
Longhorns considering Big Ten?
Tom Keegan of the Lawrence Journal-World reports that the Big Ten has had
"preliminary exchanges" with Texas about joining the conference. Outside
of Notre Dame, the Longhorns are considered the Holy Grail of expansion
candidates, but they are considered such a long shot that more likely
additions such as Missouri are frequently discussed. But this news suggests
that Texas is at least willing to listen to what the Big Ten has to offer.
Adding the Longhorns would be a home run for the conference, extending
its TV reach into the most fertile recruiting ground in the country. But what
would Texas get out of it? The 'Horns already are the biggest fish in a BCS
conference, and the biggest program in their state. The additional TV money
Texas would receive as a Big Ten member would be reduced by the added travel
costs its teams would incur playing a Big Ten schedule. We suppose there is
more academic prestige among Big Ten schools. One thing to keep in mind:
Keegan's source also says that UT is considering forming its own state-wide
TV network, which presumably would remove any benefit of joining the Big Ten.
And let's not forget the Pac-10's rumored interest in the Longhorns. Could
Texas ultimately be the object of a bidding war between the Big Ten and the
Pac-10, perhaps leading to an arrangement similar to Notre Dame's with the
Big East?
Bruce Feldman: "So much of college football has changed in the past decade
or so, and you're at a competitive disadvantage if you're not doing what
everyone else is doing. Whether the additions are Utah and BYU or Utah and
Colorado, I think the positives for the league's members from a football
standpoint -- and that is the prism through which the rest of the college
athletics world tends to view things -- far surpass the negatives. Now,
is that the prism through which the Pac-10 brass see things? We'll
see."
--
So truly, if there's light then I want to see it
Now that I know what I am looking for
Truly, if there's joy then I want to feel it
Here in this world is where I want to be
'Cause I can't cry anymore
------Delerium Ft: Nerina Pallot "Truly"
--
※ 編輯: Phater 來自: 216.27.184.34 (02/13 03:04)
推 viking0518:我怎麼突然直覺想到USC和UCLA09年交手最後1分鐘.. 02/13 03:16
推 freesoul:就colorado去pac-10，mizzou來big-ten，然後原來big-ten 02/13 05:39
→ freesoul:名成big-12，原來big-12改名成big-10就好啦~ 02/13 05:40
→ freesoul:^改 02/13 05:40
推 nacarafog:個人不贊同Texas Big10 遠的要死 天氣又差 02/13 05:47
→ nacarafog:想想看如果去Penn State打比賽就超累 光搭飛機就一天 02/13 05:48
→ nacarafog:PAC10還ok 但是前提是OU跟aTm要一起去 02/13 05:49
→ nacarafog:機會不大 看來看去還是 繼續待在Big12 最好 02/13 05:50
→ nacarafog:如果 Colorado跟Missouri走了的話 可能要從Non-AQ補球隊 02/13 05:51
→ nacarafog:我覺得我們應該要把UTAH跟BYU找進來 02/13 05:52
推 TKtrojan:NCAA又在旁支末節(過度慶祝)上面大做文章啦... 02/13 06:25
→ TKtrojan:Pac-10最近想挖球隊也是因為跟電視台合約快到 想學兩大 02/13 06:27
→ TKtrojan:分區一樣擴充市場...而Colorado所在的是Denver-Boulder 02/13 06:28
→ TKtrojan:這塊洛磯山脈最大的市場 會想挖來也不意外 02/13 06:28
→ TKtrojan:畢竟Boise,Fresno市場太小 猶他兩隊對Pac10興趣又不大 02/13 06:29
推 mrkey:P10要挖, try UNLV or Nevada??? 02/13 08:36
→ mrkey:eye black限制實在有點白目 TD celebration 也要管更是.. 02/13 08:37
推 mrkey:Texas要離開那B12也順便解散了吧 不過Texas要離開大概很難 02/13 08:44
→ mrkey:如果Texas走,地理性來說,那Baylor,TTU,A&M怎麼辦? 02/13 08:44
推 mrkey:Mizzou是挺適合去參加B10, 每年都會和ILL打braggin' right 02/13 08:52
→ mrkey:且Columbia,MO也比Austin離B10 states近很多 02/13 08:53
→ Phater:Pac-10跟Big-10同時也有學術成就上的考量,所以UNLV跟Nevada 02/13 09:01
→ Phater:還有一些小的州立大學並不符合他們的需要 02/13 09:02
推 nacarafog:我覺得Texas 要加入Pac10 比較合理 02/13 09:40
→ nacarafog:missouri去 Big 10 02/13 09:41
→ nacarafog:順便把OU aTm TECH Baylor Okie state Co. Neb 02/13 09:43
→ nacarafog:帶走 組一個PAC 20 這樣其實還不賴 02/13 09:44
推 rayc:樓上你是太閒不用上課在那邊唬爛是吧 02/13 12:34
推 nacarafog:哈哈哈 星期五耶 02/13 12:49
→ nacarafog:對了我們這三天是Junior day剛剛收了三個2011的球員 02/13 12:51