[NFL!] Brett Favre rule?

[mrkey (距離太遠 思念太近)]

說這樣有點諷刺 (or subjective), 但是 NFL 有意要考慮改變規則, 有關於延長賽:

   1. If the team that receives the ball first scores a touchdown, the game
is over.
   2. If the team that receives the ball first scores a field goal, then the
other team would receive a chance to score. If that team doesn't score, they
lose. If they get a touchdown, they win. If they kick a field goal, the game
continues in sudden death format.
   3. The rules would only apply for postseason games.


這個改變, 當然是看到了 NFC 冠軍賽, Favre & Vikes 在完全沒有拿到球的情形下,

在延長賽輸球.




* 小見..如果純粹為了改規則, 為何不改成和大學一樣, 只不過必須要 kickoff 呢?

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 69.141.44.192
推 Beatles:我也覺得大學的延長賽規則比較合理
推 krajicek:那一球都沒拿到就贏的呢XD（例如今年ARZ那場）
→ krajicek:我是說Warner連上場都沒有就贏了
→ dragonyy:防守隊得分是否一定為達陣？照這規則來說還是直接贏了
推 TomCourtenay:可能是Safety阿
推 krajicek:我覺得照這改法，還不如不改
推 mistko:大學規則比較好+1
推 fatfatgoose:請問一下  大學規則是啥??
推 mistko:簡單來說就是以Round計吧