作者lwsun (大叔)
看板NTU09DFLL
標題Re: Concerning the possible curriculum change
時間Sat Apr 3 00:35:26 2010
※ 引述《mandy14039 (Mandy Lu)》之銘言:
: ※ 引述《lwsun (大叔)》之銘言:
: : There's a video clip concerned with a professor's opinion about the issue of
: : removing the FE for DFLL's student next semester. If interested, you can watch
: : it on my FB webpage. However, because it's just a personal opinion, plz keep it
: : low-keyed, and it's available to my FB's friends only.
: Thanks for 大叔's video. Ms.Chung's talk did arouse some students' attention.
: Some of us discussed after Guy's class as well as in our Freshman Chinese class.
: There are two separate (possible) changes about future DFLL courses.
: The fisrt one is to remove the Freshman English or not.
: The other one is the size of Literature courses.
: I know there are many classmates who agree with Ms.Chung's opinion.
: However, I also think that before we want to convey our ideas to the school
: or the DFLL office, we should first hear what others think.
: The problem is that we are not in the same class so there are few chances for
: us to discuss, maybe more specifically, on these curriculum issues.
: Let's use this place to share our opinions:)
First, please forgive me for writing such poor words.
I just chatted with C.J. on the MSN, and he mentioned something interesting.
We talked about if the materials that Ms. Chung, Giles, and Guy taught us so
far is replaceable or not, and I said maybe Guy's MLA style is the most
important thing than those of Ms. Chung and Giles, because we'll learn
linguistics in the future. As to the vocabularies, I'm sure we'll keep on
learning them in every course. But, C.J. pointed out the truth told by a
senior student. Actually, when attending the course of Junior Composition,
we'll have chance to learn about the MLA style, so it turns out to be
replaceable too, and Guy just taught the things that we'll learn when we're
juniors.
Therefore, I was confused. If we'll contact with these things again in the
near future, why should we learn them in advance? I guess maybe they want us
to establish the foundation of future learning. Afterall, some of us are not
quite so good in the aspect of lessons. I think they want us to be fully
prepared when facing the incoming challenges.
So, it seems to still be a controversy worth discussing, and no wonder
professors of DFLL are keeping arguing. What's other classmates' opinion?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.247.74
※ 編輯: lwsun 來自: 140.112.247.74 (04/03 00:39)
→ Licyn :My composition book includes MLA style already. 04/03 01:00
→ Licyn :Maybe someone thinks we should keep learning that 04/03 01:05
推 brian5pig :I just think that there should be a system to let 04/03 01:35
→ brian5pig :students weave the course 04/03 01:35
→ brian5pig :and it's not asking much either, since every 04/03 01:36
→ brian5pig :department except ours already does it this way 04/03 01:37
推 dan800512 :careful when arguing with 'senior citizens'... 04/03 01:58
推 brian5pig :they may bite? 04/03 01:59
推 dan800512 :with false teeth 04/03 02:03
推 dOodoOhOw :I smell age discrimination in the air. 04/03 07:23
→ dOodoOhOw :btw you don' need to wait till you get so aged 04/03 07:23
→ dOodoOhOw :profs do MLA in the sopho comp already 04/03 07:24
推 DeepRiver226:Some do, some not. 04/03 09:42