→ yellowfishie:Igor 拿下了 best paper award... 04/18 08:22
※ 編輯: yellowfishie 來自: 140.112.48.60 (04/18 08:43)
Future of chip design revealed at ISPD
R. Colin Johnson
EE Times
(04/17/2008 1:20 H EDT)
PORTLAND, Ore. —Advances in the design and fabrication of semiconductors
were unveiled here this week at the International Symposium on Physical
Design (ISPD, April 13-16, 2008, Portland, Ore.). As the premier forum for
sharing leading-edge results in chip-design methodologies, the ISPD also
identifies future research trends years before they become commercialized.
This year, topics ranged from the need for collaboration among chip makers at
the 32-nanometer node, how logic-synthesis is solving problems with
physical-synthesis, how radio-frequency interconnection strategies could
enhance standard CMOS, to how the Taiwanese beat both the U.S. and Europeans
in the ISPD Global Routing Contest.
The keynote address was given by Antun Domic, senior vice president and
general manager at Synopsys Inc. (Mountain View, Calif.) According to Domic,
all the major semiconductor makers--except Intel--need collaborative help to
be successful in manufacturing at the 32-nanometer node.
"I'm not saying that Texas Instruments or NXP or the others will have to go
fabless. What I'm saying is that instead of doing 32-nanometer themselves,
they will need to share that process development with others, and then
transfer the finished process to their own fabs. Of course, I don't think
Intel needs help, but the IBM-led consortium [with Samsung Electronics,
Infineon Technologies, ST Microelectronics, Chartered Semiconductor,
Freescale, and Toshiba] is an example of what every semiconductor maker,
except Intel, needs to do to get to the 32-nanometer node," said Domic.
Apparently verifying Domic's prediction, IBM and its partners recently
claimed their jointly developed 32-nanometer process will use high-k
dielectrics to trump the rest of the industry in speed and power consumption.
Of course, not all predictions made at ISPD have come to pass. In fact Domic
begged to differ with past-ISPD keynote speaker, Magma Design Automation
chief executive officer Rajeev Madhavan, who predicted "The Death of Logic
Synthesis" in his 2005 address. Madhavan's point was that the preliminary
circuits cast by logic synthesis could not accurately simulate the problems
that would have to be faced when the circuit was physically implemented
during the physical-design step, thus the solution to more and more problems
were being delayed until physical design. If that trend continued, Madhavan
argued, logic synthesis would eventually disappear into physical design. But,
according to Domic, just the opposite has happened.
"What we are seeing today is a revival of logic synthesis," said Domic.
"Physical synthesis is not just place-and-route anymore, but is being used
together with logic synthesis. The two are becoming interleaved, along with
design-for-manufacturability issues, giving designers more leverage."
The "Best Paper" award seemed to confirm Domic's thesis, by rewarding
University of Michigan professors Igor Markov and Valeria Bertacco for their
work on interleaving logic- and physical-synthesis. Markov and Bertacco
showed how to use functional simulation and logic restructuring in a way that
improves delay times without iterative design optimizations.
"Today, poor scaling in interconnects often necessitates many design
optimizations to meet performance specifications due to the difficulty of
estimating delays," said Markov. "Our solution to this problem is to identify
interconnects amenable to optimization through logic restructuring and to use
an algorithm to show which placed subcircuits hold the greatest promise for
interconnect reduction."
'Best Paper' award
Markov and Bertacco were given the "Best Paper" award by a steering committee
that included industry experts from Cadence, IBM, Intel and Magma. According
to the steering committee, Markov and Bertacco combined logic- and
physical-synthesis in a novel new way that provided a concrete example of how
logic synthesis was alive and well.
"One of the nice elements of this work is that it's a useful integration of
two different domains," said steering committee chair, Professor Patrick
Madden, SUNY, Binghamton. "They have merged a couple of tasks that would
normally be viewed as independent, and shown that this can give a significant
benefit."
The ISPD program chair, IBM Austin Research Laboratory (Texas) researcher
Gi-Joon Nam, also concurred that melding logic- and physical-synthesis is the
wave of the future in chip-design practices.
"Normally, lots of efforts are made during the back end of physical synthesis
flow to clean up timing violations," said Nam. "Markov [and Bertacco] avoid
this issue with a simulation-based method instead of thorough BDD [balancing
domain decomposition] equivalence checking. The bottom line is that they have
bridged the gap between logic synthesis and physical synthesis."
Another paper of note, according to general chair David Pan, an EE Professor
at the University of Texas (Austin), was one showing how to create
ultra-high-speed on-chip interconnects using radio frequency (RF)
transmission lines. This was presented by Professors Frank Chang and Jason
Cong of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA). In this
interconnect scheme, data is transmitted by modulating an electromagnetic
wave along an RF transmission line that can be implemented using standard
CMOS processing steps.
"Its advantages compared with conventional wiring include low-latency,
low-power and reconfigurability" said Pan. "If RF interconnect becomes
mainstream, this technique will solve many physical-design problems."
Pan and Nam were also instrumental in creating a suite of 16 routing
benchmarks used to judge this year's ISPD "Global Routing Contest." Eleven
entries were received this year from four countries. Four each were received
from the U.S. and Taiwan, two from Hong Kong and one from Germany. Two awards
were given for first and second places, both of which went to Taiwanese
researchers.
"The important thing to me," said Nam, "is that every team made significant
improvements over the entries from last year. Not only were they able to
achieve better quality results, in terms of less overflow and better
wirelengths, but the runtime of these global routers improved noticeably--up
to 10-times better than last year."
http://tinyurl.com/4bxndd
--
◣ ◢
..
◥S
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.48.60