Re: [討論] 今年的合約跟交易

[vegas (買雞頭貴過買松阪牛?)]

※ 引述《kafen (石頭)》之銘言：
: And the teams obtain those ACEs will sign them long term before the season
  is over. Just like the Santana case.

    In Santana's case, the reason Mets signed him with a fat contract is not
because Mets want a contract long and big but because Santana had full NTC
(no-trade clasue) to void any possible deal that includes him. Mets has to
offer a good enough contract to persuade Santana to give up his NTC to
complete the deal.



--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 116.59.68.147
※ 編輯: vegas           來自: 116.59.68.147        (07/05 15:13)
推 kafen:from Mets' perspective, they might not want to sigh such
→ kafen:a huge contract for that long. So you are right. But
→ kafen:they did not want to simply rent Santana for 1 yr either
→ kafen:especially after giving up that much farm talent