[外序] 裁判竟沒因哈斯蘭的惡意犯規把他踢出場

[PiGFAcE (被遺忘在沙灘上的腳印)]

http://www.roundballchat.com/2012/05/refs-fail-to-kick-haslem-out-of-the-game-for-cheap-shot/

Refs fail to kick Haslem out of the game for cheap shot
Published on May 23, 2012 by Scott Shirley   ·   No Comments

裁判竟沒因哈斯蘭的惡意犯規把他踢出場

The Indiana Pacers and Miami Heat have had a real physical series and in game 5 things took a turn
for the worst.

溜馬和熱火在系列賽裡真正的有很多身體接觸且在第五戰一切都變得更糟了

Things all started when Tyler Hansbrough hit Dwyane Wade in the head.
While this probably deserved to be a Flagrant-one;
Hansbrough made a play on the ball and the foul was not excessive.

這一切都從漢堡在一次犯規中打到偉德的頭開始
當然這有被判一個一級惡意犯規的空間
漢堡試著把球守下來且這球並沒有犯得太大

A few minutes after that Udonis Haslem was called for a Flagrant-one on Hansbrough.
However, Haslem should have received a Flagrant-two and have been kicked out of the game.
When Hansbrough was going up to take a shot Haslem just hit Hansbrough in his face with
both of his hands. Haslem made no play on the ball. There was also a wind up motion and
it was pretty excessive.

在不久之後哈斯蘭也犯漢堡一個一級惡意犯規,
不過這球應該是要被判一個二級惡意犯規且他應該要被敢出場的
當漢堡要投籃的時候哈斯蘭直接用雙拳捶了漢堡的臉,
哈斯蘭並沒有接觸到球
當我們慢動作來看的時候這個犯規似乎有點太過份了

The refs really missed the ball here. It’s a joke that they only called a Flagrant-one
on this play.

裁判這球並沒有判得很好, 這球只被吹判一級惡性犯規像是個笑話

It’s pretty clear that this was a reaction to Hansbrough’s foul on Wade. However,
that’s not the way you get even by doing a cheap shot. The NBA will look at this and
Haslem will be hearing from the league very soon.

這球也很明顯是針對之前漢堡犯偉德的規而來的.
但無論如何你不能蓄意的犯一個惡劣的犯規來扯平
NBA 當局會再檢視這一球且相信他們很快就會針對這球有看法

After the Haslem cheap shot here was some reaction from Twitter from various people.

在這個惡性犯規後聽聽推特上大眾的說法

    Doug Gottlieb?@GottliebShow

    Barkley is right – Hans foul was just a foul- Haslem foul was a flagrant 2
    巴爵士說的對, 漢堡只是犯個小規, 哈斯蘭犯的是一個二級

    Andy Glockner?@AndyGlockner

    NBA refereeing is an absolute joke. It’s not legitimate competition.
    It’s basketball-themed entertainment. Have to keep the actors in it.
    NBA的裁判像個笑話, 這不像個合法的比賽, 這像是一個以籃球為主題的秀
    要想辦法保護好這些演員的舞台

    Overheard Metta World Peace mumbling to himself: That was a Flagrant 2
    on Haslem. If that was me, refs would have invented a Flagrant 3.

    據慈世平表示: 在哈斯蘭身上這應該是一個二級惡性犯規吧
    不過如果是我的話, 裁判應該會發明一個三級惡性犯規給我

    Dan Dakich?@dandakich

    NBA refs have zero integrity..changing fouls to keep players from fouling out..
    Flagrant 1 on Haslem..Donaghy alive/well in the Association
    NBA 裁判沒有信用了, 為了不讓球員被判出場而改變犯規的判決
    哈斯蘭的犯規只有惡性1, 多那吉在NBA裡還活的好好的

    Greg Anthony?@GregAnthony50

    That was worthy of a flagrant 2, the league may revisit that for game 6! Wow
    這應該是一個二級惡性犯規, 聯盟應該會重新檢視那個犯規

    Michael Wilbon?@RealMikeWilbon

    Totally gutless call…should’ve been a flagrant 2 on Haslem.
    Easy call to make and it wasn’t…
    沒種的判決, 這應該是一個二級惡意
    這很容易判斷卻沒有這樣吹

    HoopsHype?@hoopshype

    Udonis Haslem should have been ejected. Reminded me of a Kenyon Martin foul from a
    few years back.

    哈斯蘭應該被趕出場的, 這讓我想到 K-Mart 幾年前那個犯規

    Seth Davis?@SethDavisHoops

    If that’s not a flagrant 2 on Haslem there is no such thing as a flagrant 2.
    如果這不是二級犯規那應該就沒有什麼二級犯規了吧

    Haslem is lucky to still be in the game. If that wasn’t unnecessary and excessive …
    哈斯蘭還在場裡針得很幸運, 這個犯規是沒必要的而且太過份了

    Albert Breer?@AlbertBreer

    Barkley with the quote of the night on Haslem: “In the old days, we did do stuff like
    that, but we would at least make it look legitimate.”
    巴爵士在看完這球以後發表了言論
    "在以前 我們是會這樣打的"
    "但是我們會裝一下至少讓他看起來像是合法的"

--
邊跟印第安納的教授講電話(他在開罵 XD) 邊翻譯的
如果有點不通順的話請多包涵

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 71.189.138.47
→ NVK:所以場外花絮並非真的"不可取"，對吧?  你看多有趣
→ PiGFAcE:我覺得球員在推特罵人叫囂是很幼稚的行為
→ PiGFAcE:Should have keep the game in the game
→ NVK:評論員彼此也會叫囂、岔賭，和球員場外的放話、互幹，有差嗎?
→ NVK:同樣的戲碼不一定由"球員以外的人"來做，就顯得比較成熟吧?
→ PiGFAcE:你怎麼想我沒意見 只是我覺得球員在推特嗆聲很無聊
→ NVK:無聊?有時甚至丟臉。 尼馬之戰DG放話後來二連敗超瞎超丟人。
→ NVK:但我想說的，這是現下的文化，隨著觀眾資訊來源演進的一種文化
→ NVK:從"電視"=>"網路"，或許神米之前每一場賽後都放話，只是沒人轉
推 howlong:我快被阿泰笑死了
推 oglms:老巴犯規  裁判：逼逼,三級犯規!!!  老巴：.......
推 agentina:他媽的現在有點懷念阿泰,直接幹拐給他們
→ laiyuhao:韓斯堡自己先巴人頭 被巴回去剛好而已