→ fwf12 :所以基本上Nash簽的婚前協議是不提供贍養費的意思12/24 10:02
→ fwf12 :然後，看了一下是雙方都將不負擔對方的生活12/24 10:08
→ fwf12 :但是律師先生說Nash依舊會養家（但是不以贍養名義）12/24 10:09
→ fwf12 :這樣應該比較清楚:)12/24 10:09
Nash, who has made more than $100 million during his NBA career, filed
divorce papers Dec. 15 in Maricopa County Superior Court.
Nash在NBA的生涯中獲得1億美元以上的酬勞，12/5日，
Maricopa County的法院宣判他離婚。
Profile: Steve Nash
Nash的資料
Nash publicly announced Nov. 13 that he was divorcing his wife. It was the
day after she gave birth to the couple's third child, a son. The couple
was together about nine years, and was married June 11, 2005. They also
have twin daughters who are 6.
在11/13，Nash公開宣布離婚。那一天他的妻子為他生下了第三個小孩，一個兒子。
他和他老婆交往了九年，從2005年6/11結縭至今。
也有一對6歲的雙胞胎女兒。
In the divorce filing, Nash said their marriage is "irretrievably broken"
with "no reasonable prospect of reconciliation."
在離婚的聲明中，Nash的說法是他們的婚姻有「沒有理由相信會和解的不可彌補的裂痕」
In a statement issued Tuesday, Alejandra said she was surprised by her
husband's decision.
Alejandra在星期二發表的聲明指出，她對於Nash的決定感到震驚。
"I still do not quite understand what interests possessed Steve to do such
a thing at this moment, as he told me of his desire to divorce the day
before the birth of our son," she said. "I thought I knew Steve better.
But no matter how trying and disappointing the situation, Steve is the
father of our family. I hope whatever the future holds this process will
do right by all of them."
「我還是無法明白到底是什麼致使Nash在這樣的時刻做出這樣的決定──在他告訴我
他的決定的前一天我們的兒子才剛剛出生。我以為我很了解Steve......然而無論
怎麼嘗試和失望不斷循環的處境一再發生，他仍然是這個家庭的父親。我希望不管
未來發生了什麼事，對所有人來說，這樣會是好的。」
In the divorce petition, Nash asks the court to uphold a premarital agreement
signed three days before their wedding. Among other things, it says each
side has waived any claim to permanent spousal maintenance.
在離婚協議中，Nash要求法庭根據他們在婚前三天所簽署的婚前協議執行相關事項。
除此之外，協議規定雙方都應該放棄聲稱對孩子擁有終生的撫養權。
Steven Wolfson, an attorney for Steve Nash, said he could not discuss details
of the filing. But he said Nash would provide for his wife and children.
律師Steven Wolfson說，他不能透露關於這件案子的細節。
但是Nash會保護他的妻兒。
"Both she and the children will be provided for, there is no issue along
those lines at all," Wolfson said. "We are very hopeful that he and his wife
and the children's privacy can be respected as they work through this."
Wolfson說：
「她和孩子們會被保護於，在這個案件中沒有任何其他的問題。
我們也很希望當他們處理這件事情時，他和妻兒的隱私可以被尊重。」
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 180.218.196.150
→ bll135 :這篇翻得好難過喔。 12/23 22:13
※ bll135:轉錄至看板 SteveNash13 12/23 22:13
→ Sakber :唉 /pat 12/23 22:13
※ 編輯: bll135 來自: 180.218.196.150 (12/23 22:17)
→ GN2000 :所以到底是為啥要離婚？ 12/23 22:18
→ bll135 :沒講。應該跟聚少離多脫不了關係吧我想...... 12/23 22:19
推 abcd810112 :真是越來越不懂老大了~"~ 12/23 22:22
→ abcd810112 :I thought I knew Steve better是說我以為我更了解他 12/23 22:23
→ bll135 :謝謝... 12/23 22:23
→ abcd810112 :很了解他啦 恍神= =" 12/23 22:24
其實差不多阿XD
※ 編輯: bll135 來自: 180.218.196.150 (12/23 22:24)
→ abcd810112 :因為我想說更了解他講起來好像很奇怪的感覺XD" 12/23 22:25
→ bll135 :噢噢這樣說好像也是..... 12/23 22:25
推 abcd810112 :其實我一直搞不懂permanent spousal maintenance的意 12/23 22:27
→ abcd810112 :思 我昨天在看的時候就一直在想= = 有專業人士嗎XD 12/23 22:28
推 jlcsn :是老大提出離婚的@_@|| 我好驚訝喔Orz 12/23 22:41
推 truegodchild:家務事看看就好 12/23 22:42
推 abcd810112 :我一直以為他是很愛家的= =... 12/23 22:43
→ bll135 :不見得是不愛家，也許他有他的苦衷...... 12/23 22:45
→ abcd810112 :詭異的時間點然後他現在感覺還是過得很爽 整人新招? 12/23 22:46
推 abcd810112 :算了= =我在激動啥= = 12/23 22:48
→ bll135 :對阿 你在激動啥XD 12/23 22:48
推 DragicGoran :想不到我跟Nash的愛情觀這麼類似... 12/23 22:57
→ DASHOCK :離婚沒必要那麼嚴肅拉 婚姻是一輩子的 不能勉強 12/23 22:58
→ DASHOCK :有時候愛 但是也是有別的原因要分開 12/23 22:58
推 abcd810112 :樓上還沒結婚? 12/23 22:58
→ abcd810112 :=口=" 12/23 22:58
→ DASHOCK :還沒阿 不過我看過不少親戚不合還硬要勉強的一起 12/23 23:01
→ DASHOCK :abc應該是問小帥哥吧=口= 12/23 23:01
推 abcd810112 :是 不過問你也是一樣的XD 12/23 23:03
→ abcd810112 :我看我們開個婚姻輔導置底好了XD 12/23 23:04
→ bll135 :男女板歡迎你XD 12/23 23:08
推 JHNJHNJHN :XD 12/23 23:08
推 abcd810112 :其實我是覺得在這麼敏感的時機提離婚真的很弔詭.. 12/23 23:10
→ pepeoa :這...可惜了...完美男人的身份出現了一些裂痕〒△〒 12/23 23:24
→ abcd810112 :不能再同意樓上更多ˊˋ 12/23 23:25
推 thegod13 :總覺得跟第三個小孩有關(綠帽?)... 純猜測 12/23 23:41
推 guitarist326:樓上～我看完整篇之後也跟你有同樣想法！！！！！ 12/23 23:46
→ MoonSkyFish :看到生孩子那行馬上聯想到樓樓上的理由... 12/23 23:47
推 thegod13 :想法歸想法 還滿難過的 沒憑沒據所以別延伸下去了 12/23 23:55
推 guitarist326:嗯..... 12/23 23:58
→ bll135 :想太多了= =...... 12/23 23:59
推 jeromee :感謝翻譯，辛苦了。 12/24 00:19
推 airily2 :推翻譯 12/24 01:58
推 airily2 :唉可是好囉喔... 12/24 02:02
推 chadey :Nash這一年來真是苦了他了 場上場外 唉 12/24 05:08
推 fwf12 :我查了一下...Spousal support比較像是贍養費 12/24 10:01
→ fwf12 :所以基本上Nash簽的婚前協議是不提供贍養費的意思 12/24 10:02
推 kingjames23 :所以這樣可以跟司機結婚了嗎??????????? 12/24 10:07
→ fwf12 :然後，看了一下是雙方都將不負擔對方的生活 12/24 10:08
→ fwf12 :但是律師先生說Nash依舊會養家（但是不以贍養名義） 12/24 10:09
→ fwf12 :這樣應該比較清楚:) 12/24 10:09
→ bll135 :謝謝，原來我翻錯了>///< 12/24 17:27
※ 編輯: bll135 來自: 180.218.196.150 (12/24 17:27)