→ lynner:在這裡問Mead可能不容易有答案 09/29 02:32
→ lynner:但至少至少...說說是哪本書，貼段文字上來才好討論...... 09/29 02:33
Many living thing other than human exist in association with others of their
own kind and profoundly affected by this.Mead argued,however,that the basis
for human interaction differs substantially from other animals,including our
primate cousins.Each individual,in beginning an act,engages in overt and
visible action that can be detected by others and serve as stimuli to their
response.Its physical gestures are stimuli that key an aggresive response
from the other.Interaction thus proceeds between the animals,with the control
of each dog's behavior effectively in the hands of the other. In no sense
does either "decide" or "make up its mind" to act in a certain way.In no
sense does either "decide" or "make up its mind" to act in a certain way.It
is quite otherwise for humans,as Mead so incisively saw and explained.
Humans are animals who possess language and whose conduct occurs in a world
of word.We are attuned not just to the overt bodily movements of others,but
also to a complex set of vocalization that precede and accompany their acts
and our own. Second,these vocal gestures act of speech have the unique
property of arousing in the one using them nearly the same response as they
arouse in the others to whom they are directed.
大概是這篇文章 說實在有些段落還是看不懂 所以想貼上來問問大家
※ 編輯: a33278596 來自: 116.59.230.36 (09/29 13:31)
推 Wengboyu:Vocal gestures act of speech可能是指語氣或語言的情緒 09/29 14:20