Re: [請益] 這樣有侵犯專利嗎?

[chishow (英倫情人)]

如果是 infrard 的 LED 有觸碰到的話
那 VCSEL 的 chip 也算是其中一種嗎?

※ 引述《chishow (英倫情人)》之銘言：
: 請叫各位前輩:
: 如果有一篇美國專利是這樣 他的權利項只有宣稱 light emitting diode
: 但是他在說明中指出這個LED 可以是infrared 那如果我們也使用紅外光的
: 光源 是不是靜觸碰它的專利 如果是要如何避免? 如下文所示:
: What is claimed is:
: 1. A modulated optical mouse for a personal computer, the optical
: mouse comprising:
: a body having a predetermined space defined inside the body and
: having at least one lead securely provided inside the space and
: feet each electrically connected to one of the feet;
: at least one light emitting diode mounted inside the space to
:              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: electrically connect with the lead, the light emitting diode being
: at a bottom of the body; and
: at least one sensor received in the space to electrically connect
: with the lead and to correspond to the reflective light from
: reflective surface (table surface) of light emitting diode.
: DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
: [0024] The LED 3 is mounted inside the space 21 to electrically
: connect with the lead 22. The LED 3 is at the bottom of the body 2
: and is able to emit visible light, infrared and the like.
:                                    ^^^^^^^^^

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 140.112.5.72
→ forcomet:這樣的問題沒人敢打包票,要看VCSEL是不是被涵蓋在LED內
→ forcomet:以剛剛查了一下,兩者都屬面射型雷射發光,不知道會不會因
→ forcomet:為這樣被歸類在一起,而被認為侵權?不敢保證
推 JSL3719:美國公開20030142075號公開案？
→ JSL3719:這個案子應該已經死了
→ JSL3719:不過對應台灣案倒是有通過，公告第549490新型專利