Re: [書籍] 關於應用數學的書籍

[JohnMash (John)]

※ 引述《henrypinge (Edward)》之銘言：
: 請問有沒有"詳細"介紹變分法的書籍  小弟在圖書館翻過板上推薦的物數
: 但說實在的  內容都不是很滿意  物數的內容都是濃縮版偏應用  重要的
: 數學概念 原理 證明都很缺乏  所以有沒有內容很齊全但不是濃縮版的
: 小弟修了六門數學  了解到只讀濃縮的物數會變成
: "知其然 不知其所以然"


   You just use it.

   If you read the original paper of general relativity of

   Einstein in 1916, you will find Einstein also just use

   it. The important is physics.

   Hermann Weyl is a great mathematician and

   wrote a book of relativity.

   But he cannot invent relativity.

   Maybe the problem is

   Could you use variation method correctly?

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.4.235
推 kenny2963:對物理方面是這樣沒錯....物理意義才是重點
推 sxt56862:的確是這樣 數學定理的原理或證明是數學系的事情
推 asis:relativity?
※ 編輯: JohnMash        來自: 140.112.4.235        (11/06 22:56)
→ JohnMash:you are right
→ Keelungman:The important is physics.  <=沒主詞
→ JohnMash:the rich=the rich men
推 covari:"It is physics that matters."
→ JohnMash:there are 100 ways to express the same meaning.
→ kenny2963:開始挑英文錯誤了XD 雖然有看到不過看得懂就算了...
→ JohnMash:No, it is not false.
推 cipherman:The important "thing" is physics.
→ JohnMash:the rich=the rich men
推 JackBarock:我竟然看得懂.....完了我文法要砍掉重練了 XD
→ JackBarock:完全沒注意到沒主詞這件事情