看板 Physics 關於我們 聯絡資訊
※ 引述《graddivcurl (為所應為)》之銘言: : Hi, : A. Garrett Lisi is a remarkable physicist. I wrote two short articles : on him and posted them on the PTT Physics Board about three years ago. : His 2007 ArXiv preprint (arXiv:0711.0770) has been cited 6 times since : then (based on Web of Science) by others, including Lee Smolin's 2009 : Physical Review D Paper. : Interestingly enough, his easy version of his famous E8 story was : published in Scientific American in Dec of 2010 (Source: Science : American (2010), Dec: 30-37; Author: A. Garrett Lisi & James Owen : Weatherall; Title: A geometric theory of everything). : Hopefully, this article is accessible to current undergrad : physics majors. In addition, the more-to-explore section at the end : of this article allows curious readers to devle deeply into : the subject matter. : Finally, an experiment to prove or disprove his theory will be : highly desirable in the near future. 大家想聽八卦我就大概講一下吧,但為甚麼被砲轟切確的理由我已經不太記得了。 他當時剛發完那篇論文後沒多久就四處去演講,演講的目的並不只是要去說他在 做的東西最主要的是在找合作夥伴。我記得他說他很"孤單",沒有甚麼人願意跟 他合作做他現在在想的這個問題。但台下的物理學家並不相信他的那一篇論文, 我記得理由是說,跟目前"現有的一些模型"有衝突。底下物理學家有很多,還包括 弦論,迴圈量子重力論等等的人。至於詳情如何就有請專家了! 不過看這種演講究很精彩,比起只有單純的presentation有趣多了XD,一來一往的 知識較勁,是科學發展進步的一個因素之一。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 128.120.178.219
noonee:所以恐怕要請懂所謂的有衝突的現有模型的人來解釋了 07/22 02:01
noonee:版上有做弦論的吧?XD 07/22 02:02
wohtp:我稍微翻了一下arxiv paper。他看起來還在 tree-level 07/22 08:59
wohtp:我稍微翻了一下arxiv paper。他看起來還在 tree-level 07/22 09:04
wohtp:打轉嘛。雖然在最後稍微提了一句 RG。 07/22 09:05
wohtp:我是看不出他跟standard model有什麼矛盾啦。 07/22 09:06
wohtp:但是我一定第一個問他 RG flow 跟 hierachy problem。 07/22 09:07
psion:Distler說他的群論不及格XD 07/23 10:03