[考古] 美國憲法 魔王 102年 期中

[ikariamman (嘿嘿)]

1. What are the rationale justice holmes insisted to apply the clear and

  present danger test in the dissenting opinon of abram's v. us and

  gitlow v. new york?

2.what are the direct incitement test used inmass publishing co v. pattern?

3.why justice sanford held that the bad tendency test should be applied

  in gitlow v. new york?

4.what are the rational for justice brandie's concurning opinion to defend

  the clear and imminent danger test?

5.give the reason why cj vinson applied the clear and present danger that

  different from  j holmes?

6.if a university stutent said in public if he had a rifle,the first man

  he want to kill is presedent. is this within the constitional free speech?

7.how to define the fighting words?

  why it is not within the freedom of speech?


 希望會過    不然就要身寸口惹

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 163.14.5.86
※ 編輯: ikariamman      來自: 163.14.5.86          (11/05 21:25)
※ 編輯: ikariamman      來自: 112.105.92.6         (11/05 23:24)
推 ted1110:認真覺得老師的題目都不算題目，把案件架構背出來才是真的
推 mmc109815035:真心覺得美憲如果只念那個case本身，而沒有兩相對照c
推 mmc109815035:case之前之後相類議題的case的不同，考試很難寫出完
→ mmc109815035:整的答案~
推 mmc109815035:可以請問大家有沒有林世宗美憲期末的考古題嗎？QQ
→ ikariamman:每班進度不一樣耶