看板 SF 關於我們 聯絡資訊
我在這裡看到這段:http://orzistic.org/s/pixmicat.php?res=9025#q9073 是Star Trek編劇抱怨此劇沒有認真設定科技,只是編出一些科技泡泡 做劇情道具。 http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2009/10/why_i_hate_star_trek.html http://blastr.com/2009/10/ron-moore-calls-star-trek.php [Ron Moore] described how the writers would just insert "tech" into the scripts whenever they needed to resolve a story or plot line, then they'd have consultants fill in the appropriate words (aka technobabble) later. [ . . . ] La Forge: "Captain, the tech is overteching." Picard: "Well, route the auxiliary tech to the tech, Mr. La Forge." La Forge: "No, Captain. Captain, I've tried to tech the tech, and it won't work." Picard: "Well, then we're doomed." ---- 不過我覺得不管別的事情,這個原稿本身很有趣啊,好像是很高階的程式語言。 假想未來科技先進,技術可以「虛擬化」,連講話甚至思考都把技術細節架空, 那一定很酷。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.25.179.106
Yenchin:Trek 迷會無限跳針「設定很完整」「真實科技」...etc 08/24 23:02
hyperino:最後一句講的事 心海羅盤葉教授就辦得到了 08/25 00:50
MOONRAKER:不酷啊,這樣「人之異於草木也幾希」 XD 08/25 09:34