CLINT EASTWOOD, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
Respondent; NATIONAL ENQUIRER, INC., Real Party in Interest
Civ. No. 67746
Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, Division Seven
149 Cal. App. 3d 409; 198 Cal. Rptr. 342; 1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 2397; 10 Media
L. Rep. 1073
December 1, 1983
找到了
附上CASE SUMMARY
PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Petitioner, a well-known actor, sought review of a
judgment of respondent Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California),
which sustained the general demurrer of real party in interest tabloid
newspaper, on the basis that petitioner had failed to state cause of action
in a suit against the newspaper alleging invasion of privacy through
commercial appropriation under Cal. Civ. Code
OVERVIEW: Petitioner, a well-known actor, brought suit against the tabloid
newspaper for invasion of privacy through the commercial appropriation of his
name, photograph, and likeness, under both the common law and Cal. Civ. Code
the basis that petition
OUTCOME: The court held that the general demurrer was improperly sustained.
The newspaper's use of petitioner's likeness to promote a false article could
have infringed petitioner's right of publicity because the statute provided
no exemption for publication of news known to be false. Petitioner was
granted leave to amend his action to allege that the article was published
with knowledge or recklessness as to its falsity.
其中所說的要件:
A common law cause of action for appropriation of name or likeness may be
pleaded by alleging (1) a defendant's use of the plaintiff's identity; (2)
the appropriation of plaintiff's name or likeness to defendant's advantage,
commercially or otherwise; (3) lack of consent; and (4) resulting injury.
其他的
The right of publicity includes not only the power to control the
exploitation of one's personality through licensing agreements, but also the
right to obtain relief, both injunctive and/or for damages, when a third
party appropriates one's name and likeness for commercial purposes without
permission.
※ 引述《thubo (♡)》之銘言：
: 這篇判決有所謂publicity right的要件
: 我看大家的看法大多在本國法上
: 找一下美國的意見好了
: 不過我找不到這篇判決
: 有空的幫忙一下囉...
: Eastwood v. superior court 149 CAl.App.3d 409, 198 Cal.Rptr. 342 ( 1983 )
: 要件
: 1.被告使用原告身分
: 2.被告盜用原告原告之姓名或肖像獲取商業上優勢
: 3.未經原告同意
: 4.造成原告損害
: 1.The defentant's use of the plaintiff's idenity
: 2.The appropiation of plaintiff's name or likeness to defentant's advantage,
: commercially or otherwise.
: 3.lack of consent
: 4.resulting injury
--
請接受我的表白 http://0rz.tw/273BG
不是一巴掌就是一輩子
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 124.8.24.45
※ 編輯: thubo 來自: 124.8.24.45 (10/01 00:03)
※ 編輯: thubo 來自: 124.8.24.45 (10/01 00:06)
※ 編輯: thubo 來自: 124.8.24.45 (10/01 00:08)
※ 編輯: thubo 來自: 124.8.24.45 (10/01 00:20)