作者Kshatri (No sé)
看板Spurs
標題[討論] 5-Man Units
時間Sun Feb 7 23:35:55 2010
從火箭版看到的有趣東西..從他們的連結來看馬刺本身..試寫分析文..請多指教
來源:
http://0rz.tw/CL2Uw ( 82games.com )
Top Five-Man Floor Units
# Unit Min Off Def +/- W L Win%
1 Parker-Bogans-Jefferson-McDyess-Duncan 186.5 1.08 0.97
+39 14 7
66.6
2 Parker-Bogans-Jefferson-Blair-Duncan 123.6
0.98 0.98 +0 6 9 40.0
3 Parker-Finley-Jefferson-Bonner-Duncan 50.4 1.09 1.09 +0 2 4
33.3
4 Hill-Mason-Ginobili-McDyess-Blair 45.5 1.04 0.91 +17 7 7 50.0
5 Parker-Ginobili-Jefferson-Bonner-Duncan 43.7 1.06 0.91 +14 6 5 54.5
6 Parker-Ginobili-Jefferson-McDyess-Duncan 42.7 1.11 1.13 +3 8 7 53.3
7 Parker-Mason-Ginobili-McDyess-Duncan 39.4 1.01
0.90 +6 7 4 63.6
8 Parker-Ginobili-Bogans-Blair-Duncan 39.1
1.14 1.18 -3 8 6 57.1
9 Hill-Mason-Ginobili-Jefferson-Blair 38.8 1.05 1.00 -2 5 5 50.0
10 Parker-Hill-Ginobili-Jefferson-Duncan 37.3 1.04 1.05 +1 7 4 63.6
Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details
# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O
1 Parker-Bogans-Jefferson-McDyess-Duncan .503 .449
+43 35% 32% 52.0% -1%
2 Parker-Bogans-Jefferson-Blair-Duncan .467 .425 0 30% 29% 51.0% -7%
3 Parker-Finley-Jefferson-Bonner-Duncan .476 .474 +12 28% 34%
43.5% -2%
4 Hill-Mason-Ginobili-McDyess-Blair .422 .388
-7 20% 31% 54.5% +1%
5 Parker-Ginobili-Jefferson-Bonner-Duncan .415
.385 +24 34% 23% 46.0% +2%
6 Parker-Ginobili-Jefferson-McDyess-Duncan
.551 .487 -1 36% 36% 47.5%
-8%
7 Parker-Mason-Ginobili-McDyess-Duncan .441 .386 +3 21% 33% 51.5% +1%
8 Parker-Ginobili-Bogans-Blair-Duncan .525
.565 +4 41% 42% 51.5% -2%
9 Hill-Mason-Ginobili-Jefferson-Blair .408 .500 -5 44%
22% 55.5% +8%
10 Parker-Hill-Ginobili-Jefferson-Duncan
.393 .469 +21
46% 48% 50.0% +6%
編號1的陣容，就是我們原本的先發陣容，平均一場球這組合會維持個約9分鐘，是這
10套先發中上場時間最多的，可以看到從進攻上或防守上的表現跟其他組合相比並不突
出多少，但是卻能有最大的勝分差及勝率，我認為這可從FTA上看出端倪。反之，編號3
的陣容平均一場球這組合約維持個約8.4分鐘，於進攻方面不輸1號陣容，但防守方面卻
也因為籃板搶輸人而被爆回去，或許樣本數有點低，但勝率是這10組中最低的。
此外，最近波波愛擺的陣容是Parker-Hill的後場組合，且讓我以第10號陣容來看，因
為這陣容也常在關鍵第四節追分時出現，於禁區防守上或許不足，但考量到機動性便利
執行戰術，算是蠻常用的陣容，可看出投籃距離為最遠，但命中率卻是很糟糕，似乎除了
勝率外看不出有什麼特別優勢，算是飆三分時的短期之宜吧。
另外奇妙的是，第9號陣容的籃板率竟是最高的，在禁區沒老大的情況下這一定出了什
麼差錯，連雙方的失誤差都是最大的，這真是太神奇了! 傑克! 由於我們的先發、板凳
都還不固定，所以也不知道該怎麼解讀他們在場上時的效益，可確定的是目前我們的板凳
火力以場均40.4分居全聯盟之冠! ( 來源Hoopsstats:
http://0rz.tw/abDON )
至於其他組合還請眾神人們解讀吧～ <(__ __)>
Legend
Min = the total minutes the unit was on the floor.
Off = the unit's points per possession.
Def = the unit's points per possession allowed.
+/- = the team net points for the unit.
W = number of games a unit outscored its opponents while on the court.
L = number of games a unit was outscored by its opponents while on the court.
Win% = the winning percentage for the unit based on Wins versus Losses.
eFG = the effective shooting percentage, adjusted for the value of 3-point
shots.
eFGA = the effective shooting percentage allowed to opponents.
FTA = net free throw attempts.
Close = the percentage of shots taken from close range.
dClose = the percentage of opponents' shots taken from close range.
Reb = the rebound percentage for the unit, based on chances.
T/O = the net turnover percentage for the unit based on opponent turnovers
minus unit turnovers.
--
"They'll be all right. I never worry about the Spurs," Nowitzki said. "By the
time the playoffs start, they'll be ready. All this right now doesn't matter.
They'll be right there."
-- Mavericks forward Dirk Nowitzki, who scored 16 of his 26 points
during Dallas' 42-point fourth quarter, and the Mavericks overcame a
10-point deficit for a 112-103 victory over the Spurs on Friday night.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.229.228.231
※ 編輯: Kshatri 來自: 61.229.228.231 (02/07 23:43)
推 hc1118:真有趣的數據 02/07 23:44
推 s952750:push 02/07 23:57
推 mindd:我看到 練越久的陣容 效果越好=.= 波波趕快下定決心吧 02/08 00:00
推 zenithal:謝謝您的數據 我也是中意這種陣容 02/08 00:12
推 jiuan1027:我們的板凳其實還是Min.Reb.Ast.Stl.3pm.Eff第一 02/08 01:09
推 zenithal:這篇真是不錯且難得的數據 各位可以參考參考 再推一下 02/08 08:23
推 ando: 02/08 08:23
→ parkerwind:第一套先發就是最理想的了~ 波波沒必要一直做實驗吧= = 02/08 13:03
推 maskfrog:推數據 02/08 16:29