推 jiuan1027:Hill現階段幫助當然比較大 但也不能讓馬刺突破目前困境 06/25 23:01
推 parkerwind:有得必有失啊~! 06/25 23:02
推 steveparker:有阿我想要把錢多事少的RJ換走 06/25 23:17
推 csy1911:在Hollinger的另一篇文章 他提到這屆最有可能成才的外線 06/26 00:09
→ csy1911:除了Irving, Walker再來就是我們選中的Leonard 06/26 00:10
http://gradesof2011draft.notlong.com
來看看其他人給的分數～
John Hollinger, ESPN.com
Grade: None, but he certainly liked it.
沒給分數，不過他很明顯喜愛這筆交易
Analysis: ”You want to know why the Spurs win 50 or more games every year
and always have their cap situation under control, while the rest of the
league scrambles and flails around them? Check out tonight’s draft for a
good example.
“In a stellar trade that showed how they’re always a step ahead of everyone
else, the Spurs sent guard George Hill to Indiana for the rights to the 15th
pick Kawhi Leonard, the rights to the 42nd pick Davis Bertans and the rights
to European Erazem Lorbek.
“On paper, trading an established rotation player for the 15th pick in a
weak draft seems like a reckless gamble, but there’s a key difference
between George Hill and Kawhi Leonard: their paychecks.
“Yes, it’s a great deal for San Antonio, and it illustrates how the Spurs
have stayed on top of the standings for more than a decade by staying two
steps ahead of the competition … It’s a good example of two teams using the
system to their advantage, but for me it’s especially illustrative of how
San Antonio has played the cap-management game so much better than most of
its rivals over the past decade.”
相關翻譯keepstudying已經在前幾篇有附上了
Wes O’Donnell, Bleacher Report.com
Grade: B+
Analysis: ”Traded away George Hill, got one of the steals of the draft in
Kawhi Leonard and landed a big-time European shooter in Davis Bertans. What
more do you Spurs fans want?”
送出George Hill，然後偷到 Kawhi Leonard 再加上個歐洲的大心臟射手 Davis
Bertans ，馬刺迷們還想要多些什麼？
Matt Moore and Ben Golliver, CBS Sports.com
Grade: Not given
Analysis: “Kawhi Leonard. Huge steal for the Spurs who give up George Hill
but get a lottery-quality pick plus Davis Bertans has a lot of potential and
is just the kind of guy the Spurs can wait on. Leonard will be an impact
player immediately, the rare combination for the Spurs of youth, athleticism,
and polish. He gives them a player to help ease the transition and possibly
make one more run.”
馬刺送出了 George Hill但拿到樂透籤抓下 Kawhi Leonard是很大的一偷，加上
Davis Bertans 十分有潛力，而他也是馬刺樂於等待的人。Leonard 將能立即發
揮影響，讓馬刺變得更加年輕、有運動力以及完善。他能夠讓球隊在攻守轉換中
輕易得分，甚至有小帳加一的可能。
Dave Del Grande, CBS Sports.com
Grade: A
Analysis/Leonard: “Might have dreamed of Jimmer, but the reality remains:
The Pacers needed somebody who can shoot. Hey, this guy had a higher
field-goal percentage than Jimmer last season.”
關於 Leonard：也許有人夢想著 Jimmer 會掉下來，但事實上是溜馬需要能夠投
射的傢伙。嘿，這小子去年的命中率比 Jimmer 還要高咧。
（看起來是在交易前就寫好的）
Analysis/Joseph: “No organization executes a plan better than the Spurs.
Recognizing they could get a comparable point-guard talent in Joseph, the
deal sending George Hill to the Pacers for Kawhi Leonard was brilliant.”
關於 Joseph:沒有一個管理階層的執行能力比馬刺還要好。在他們能夠找到一個
有天份的控衛 Joseph 的情況下，把 George Hill送到溜馬換取 Kawhi Leonard
的決定十分出色。
Kurt Helin, Pro Basketball Talk.com
Grade: C
Analysis: ”They traded away George Hill and took some risks on prospects —
probably good risks, but it does not help them win right now and Tim Duncan’
s window is closing.”
他們把 George Hill送出去然後賭上年輕人的潛力——有可能是成功的賭注，但
現階段這並不能幫助他們贏球，而 Tim Duncan 已經時日無多了。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 180.176.113.175
※ 編輯: spurs2120 來自: 180.176.113.175 (06/25 22:49)