作者Alfred (Keine Ahnung)
看板Spurs
標題Re: [心得] Richard Jefferson交易簡評
時間Sun Mar 18 01:15:38 2012
補一些外電消息。
這裡有人貼了火靈哥的全部評分。有興趣的人可以看一下。
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=192921
他給馬刺B，勇士D+。
雖然他相當看得起馬刺，說我們也是冠軍競爭者之一，
不過從他用PER說馬刺將要把RJ放到板凳上的說法讓我覺得他跟老波不太熟。XD
至於勇士，他沒考慮到船長跟勇士互相看不順眼的歷史，
而且覺得RJ會妨礙他們tank，這也相當有趣。
不過對勇士來說最糟的應該是用11M去換個很可能是26順位的選秀權，
（交易的是樂透保護，所以如果馬刺萬一沒進季後賽，我們還是會有首輪簽）
而且還卡死未來薪資結構。但未來這個還可能有變動，所以或許也不用說這麼死。
Golden State: D+
Golden State gets the better player in Jefferson, and he may help them with
their playoff run. But wait, aren't they trying to tank? Wasn't that half the
reason for the Monta Ellis trade? My brain hurts.
At any rate, this is a bad trade for completely different reasons --
Jefferson has one more year left than Jackson, one in which he makes $11
million. Having already taken themselves out of the free-agent race in 2012
with the original trade for Jackson two days ago, the Warriors now have
punted on 2013 by taking on Jefferson; add an extension in the $10 million
range for Stephen Curry and they're capped out with Curry, Jefferson, David
Lee, Andris Biedrins and Andrew Bogut, and they've already used their
amnesty.
By 2013-14 the Warriors are likely to be swashbuckling with the luxury tax,
and that will be a much more punitive monster that season than it is now. All
this might make sense if they were locking in a championship contender, but
they've basically committed long-term to a fairly uninspiring nucleus. The
absolute best-case scenario is that they're the West Coast Atlanta Hawks.
They also got a first-rounder from San Antonio, but it will be a very late
one in all likelihood. Plus, nobody pays $11 million for first-round picks.
Well, except Cleveland, I guess.
San Antonio: B
It's an odd trade for a team in the championship race to make, since
Jefferson-for-Jacko is a slight downgrade at this point in their respective
careers. But the long-term savings were simply too good to pass up; San
Antonio now has massive cap flexibility in the summer of 2013.
Additionally, one can argue it made a potentially difficult move much easier.
The Spurs were likely going to have to bench Jefferson, who has started all
41 games but has by far the worst PER of San Antonio's 10 rotation players.
With Kawhi Leonard playing well and Manu Ginobili likely to return soon, they
sidestep a potentially sticky problem and can bring Jackson off the bench in
a more limited role.
http://www.poundingtherock.com/2012/3/15/2875703/richard-jefferson-for-stephen-jackson-trade-reaction-post
相對於板上的高潮（？），這篇是比較保守的評論，
進攻方面他擔心船長的命中率偏低、失誤偏高，
還有他的usage一直都很高，又愛投long distance 2，
是否能適應他在現在的馬刺裡的角色球員地位也有問題。
這個作者懷疑船長在一大四小的時候守不了4號位，這個任務是口愛的。
不過底下的timvp認為船長現在老了應該沒有繼續打2號的本錢，
總之這個打了才知道，反正我們又不是防守強隊，
而且他打3號取代的是RJ，ok的。
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=192938
timvp這篇我覺得寫的簡潔有力，希望有空的人可以翻一下。（逃）
其實不少人對船長還是有疑慮，場上場外的都有，（廢話不然也不會那麼難賣XD）
不過反正至多我們就是拿掉RJ，如果拿掉RJ對我們沒什麼影響，
那就算船長完全不能用也沒差，時間分給口愛跟小綠綠，
然後明年還有船長的到期約可以操作，怎麼想都應該要拿A啊！ lol
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 99.125.165.60
推 tth81222:不嫌棄的話我來翻翻第二篇好了>.< 03/18 01:18
推 alex40214:推! timvp寫的東西我蠻喜歡看的XD 03/18 01:19
推 tth81222:第二篇其實不少耶... 03/18 01:20
推 ParkerWind:樓上被A版主的『簡潔有力』騙到了XDDD 03/18 01:21
→ Alfred:我覺得第二篇有點太囉嗦，其實翻timvp那篇就好了 03/18 01:21
→ Alfred:不過我們坐享其成的沒資格嫌啦 XD 03/18 01:22
推 alex40214:timvp的我來翻翻看! 03/18 01:24
推 tth81222:心得或短評：我下次會先點連結再決定要不要翻譯= = 03/18 01:24
推 alex40214:欸不等等 tth要翻嗎? 03/18 01:26
推 tth81222:那我挑第一篇的重點好了 alex大第二篇交給你了(擦汗 03/18 01:28
→ tth81222:第一篇我來(置底外電區怪怪的? 03/18 01:38
→ tth81222:耍笨複製到enter= = 03/18 01:41
推 csy1911:推!!! 03/18 12:16