Re: [請益] 聽力個位數

[sandapro (閃. 打. 破兒)]

有此一說

就是那天北美的機經也有可能是錯誤的
寫機經的有很多沒聽出來
10/18那天的聽力有深度
有很多問題都很難
我是完全不管機經憑自己寫20分






※ 引述《iamashes (@shes)》之銘言：
: 我是10/18的考生，
: 成績是 R:24  L:5  S:17  W:21
: 本來想說我聽力已經很爛了，
: 沒想到我還是身邊朋友的聽力no.1  囧
: (有一位很扯，她的總分有73分，但聽力只有3分...)
: 我們大多都是在10/18考的(聽力分數為1~5分)，
: 有兩位是在10/12 (一個4分、一個5分)
: 我爬過很多文...也寄了信給ET$ (用的是精華區裡有人分享的稿)，
: 它們的回答如下:
:   We have received your request to have the Listening section of your October
: 18, 2008 TOEFL iBT exam rescored.  We regret we cannot comply with your
: request to have the Listening section rescored. The rescore service offered
: is only available for the Writing and Speaking sections, since these sections
: are scored by human raters. The Reading and Listening sections, unlike the
: Speaking and Writing, are scored at the test center by the computer. They
: undergo a rigorous scoring process in which the Reading and Listening
: sections are checked for quality and accuracy at several different stages.
:   We have, however reviewed your examinee performance record, and can confirm
: that your test score is accurate. In your case you did not answer enough
: questions correctly to get a higher test score. As stated earlier, the iBT
: TOEFL test does not have a question and answer service that would disclose
: detailed scoring information that you are requesting.  There are many
: different versions of the TOEFL iBT. For advice on improving your
: English-language skills, please refer to the below.
: http://www.ets.org/portal/site/ets/menuitem.1488512ecfd5b8849a77b13bc3921509/?vgnextoid=4dc43d0645428010VgnVCM10000022f95190RCRD&vgnextchannel=fcaf215790d68010VgnVCM10000022f95190RCRD
:   We hope this information has been helpful and wish you much success in your
: future academic endeavors.
: Sincerely,
: TOEFL iBT Services
: 看完信就 ╰(‵皿′＊)╯
: 想請問各位...除了接受這樣的回信，難道就沒有別的方法了嗎???
: 我不要求成績可以提高一點，
: 但要邪惡的ET$承認錯誤也很難吧。
: 而且我都報了下一次的考試了，
: 比第一次報名貴了300...Orz

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 218.172.52.119
推 wwwptt:雞精本來就是給背景知識好做準備用的 你的推論有誤
→ wwwptt:除非北美雞精附上錯誤答案 看的人考試直接抄上去
→ wwwptt:這樣你做的這個推論才有意義
推 pokergir1:阿...可是我完全沒看機經,聽力跟其他分數落差這麼大...
推 kingnamefu:我有看北美雞精，不過看了也是大概知道大意而已
→ kingnamefu:我覺得聽力有沒有看機精其實差別不大
→ kingnamefu:因為聽力那麼一長串，考試時有聽清楚才是重點
→ kingnamefu:而且我覺得10/18考很多細節題O__Q
→ sandapro:沒錯當你去想機經或是想那個大概就會影響你了