Re: [請益] 黃金閱讀 - Types of Social Groups

[xerophily (new user)]

 Occasionally, this may mean working with instead of against competitors.

中文: 有時候, 這意味著與競爭者合作, 而不必對抗它

 ○ Instrumental ties can develop even in situations in which people would
    normally not cooperate.

中文: 即便是在人們非合作的狀態下, Instrumental ties 也可以發展

 ○ Instrumental ties require as much emotional investment as expressive ties.

not mentioned

 ○ Instrumental ties involve security, love, and acceptance.

這是expressive ties

 ○ Instrumental ties should be expected to be significant.

not mentioned 且跟文章最後一句話相反


選A不會很神奇 選了其他的比較神奇....:D



※ 引述《iverson0227 (GoT)》之銘言：
: Paragraph 2：People are bound within relationships by two types of bonds:
: expressive ties and instrumental ties. Expressive ties are social links
: formed when we emotionally invest ourselves in and commit ourselves to other
: people. Through association with people who are meaningful to us, we achieve
: a sense of security, love, acceptance, companionship, and personal worth.
: Instrumental ties are social links formed when we cooperate with other people
: to achieve some goal. Occasionally, this may mean working with instead of
: against competitors. More often, we simply cooperate with others to reach
: some end without endowing the relationship with any larger significance.
: 4. Which of the following can be inferred about instrumental ties from the
:    author's mention of working with competitors in paragraph 2?
: ○ Instrumental ties can develop even in situations in which people would
:    normally not cooperate.
: ○ Instrumental ties require as much emotional investment as expressive ties.
: ○ Instrumental ties involve security, love, and acceptance.
: ○ Instrumental ties should be expected to be significant.
: 答案是(A)
: 不過就這段來說
: Instrumental ties are social links formed when we cooperate with other people
: to achieve some goal. Occasionally, this may mean working with instead of
: against competitors. More often, we simply cooperate with others to reach
: some end without endowing the relationship with any larger significance.
: 完全看不到(A)提到的would normally not cooperate.
: (A)到底是哪裡對阿 很神奇耶 ~"~

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.167.152.191
※ 編輯: xerophily       來自: 118.167.152.191      (01/08 17:56)
※ 編輯: xerophily       來自: 118.167.152.191      (01/08 17:57)
推 iverson0227:先給感謝推 想再問 working with instead of against
→ iverson0227:competitor 也是有合作阿 只不過是和競爭者 而(A)是說
→ iverson0227:not cooperate...
→ xerophily:競爭者不就是people who would normally not cooperate
→ xerophily:如果還是不懂～只能說別太執著啊～ET$說它對它就是對
→ xerophily:不然 妳想選哪個答案哩～如果還是無法接受 就用刪去法
→ xerophily:其實有些答案我也常覺得牽強了些～但是 總是比其他選
→ xerophily:好～ 跟人生一樣嘛～不可能都很完美～哈
推 iverson0227:哈 沒錯  感謝你的回答^^