推 wsws:又是一個精美又華麗的解答....(跪) 05/27 14:16
※ 編輯: snark 來自: 61.231.145.33 (05/27 14:17)
推 cyhung1025:厲害@@ 05/27 17:01
※ 引述《uglyy (FIASCO)》之銘言：
: 好像沒有人問過這一篇的最後一題整合題：
: 正確答案是
: - The reason Egyptian statues are motionless is linked to their
central role in cultural rituals.
: - Stone, wood, and metal statues all display the feature of frontality
: - The contrasting poses used in statues of elite and nonelite Egyptians
reveal their difference in social status.
: 我想請問的是第一個選項
: The twisted forms of Egyptian statues indicate
their importance in ritual actions.
: 為什麼不能選呢？
您應該是看錯了
第一段說
Why did the Egyptians not develop sculpture
in which the body turned and twisted through space
like classical Greek statuary?
換言之希臘式的有身體的扭轉 埃及的沒有
: 我覺得正確答案的第三個 the contrasting poses...一樣也都是implication
: 儘管文章提到they face straight ahead, neither twisted nor turning
: 但這是表示頭是朝前的，也就是身體是twisted的，不是嘛？
不是
neither twisted nor turning
既沒有扭也沒有轉
: 還是我想太多？！
還是希望大家一邊讀一邊整理內容
不要浪費時間在整合題
第一段結構
In order to 為了 ..., 條件
Without this knowledge 反之如果沒有此條件 就..
In fact, 舉例支持之前的主張
怕你不相信 要大家想想幾個問題:
Why
Why
And why
The answer to such questions
nothing to do with A and B
everything to do with the purposes
for which they were producing their art.
簡單的說第一句給了抽象的答案
所以之後都是解答
第二段:為何要 frontality:
They were designed to be put in places
where these beings could manifest themselves
in order to be the recipients of ritual actions.
為了...
第三段:材質多元 但意義相同
stone, wood, or metal:
perform the same function 所以 display frontality
由此可見此段仍在解釋 功能與型態的關連 只是換了角度
第四段
進一步反駁之前的疑問
其實只有部分的雕像是有固定外型的
deities, kings, and named members of the elite that can be called formal
其他made(僕人)可是多采多姿
這很明顯的看出來
這是寫作相當好的3段式模版
應該知道整合要選什麼了吧
不要只看每段的頭尾
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.231.145.33