Re: [題目] 新多益必考單字600 P155 L25

[chenzhishun1 (chenzhishun1)]

※ 引述《aclgpo (  )》之銘言：
: : Here is a straightforward sentence:
: : "The accountant NEED TO base his plan on realistic numbers."
: : One may rewrite it as:
: : "The accountant NEED realistic numbers TO base his plan on ."
: : But to end a sentence with a preposition is sometimes considered substandard,
: : so we follow what iwwe has suggested and put that "on" in front of "which."
:  感謝c大 i大以及其他板友的指點~ 不過我還是有點不懂
:  1. 以c大的講解 是不是也就文法上 因為on放在前面 所以加個which當介系詞的受詞
:                    而which就是realistic numbers?
:     註:如果是這樣 這種文法是叫做?
:  2. 還是說 which是引導形容詞子句 修飾realistic numbers?
:          這樣的話to base是助動詞變化來的
:          如 which the accountant can base his plan on (再把on放在前面)
:     註: 我以為這個助動詞變化成不定詞的用法只適用於名詞子句
:         如  I don't know what I should do.
:           ( I don't know what to do. )
: : → iwwe        :on which to base his plan是老外比較常用的文法      02/07 06:36
: : → iwwe        :same goes to "to which", "for which", "by which"   02/07 06:36

Dear aclgpo,

Some questions can be expained in a fews words or lines of sentences, this
question, I afraid, is not one of these.
The question you raised is about "relative clauses" or "dependent clauses."
Not a easy topic I would say, but it is important to understand it well.

Here is a nice page from BBC World Service:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/grammar/learnit/
learnitv286.shtml

also

http://www.edufind.com/english/grammar/REL3.CFM

hope that helps ^^






--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 202.169.165.62
推 aclgpo      :嗯嗯 我了解了 謝謝c大
→ iwwe        :explained* :)
推 ashurali    :在BBC那個網頁裡中間淺色底的最後一句話，第一個that
→ ashurali    :是做什麼用呢？
→ chenzhishun1:(Please)Sit down.(祈使句, subject you and is
→ chenzhishun1:often omitted.
→ chenzhishun1:(Please) Note that …. It is a that clause, also
→ chenzhishun1:called "a content clause." ^^
→ ashurali    :Note from three sentences beginning with NOTE in
→ ashurali    :that area, only the last one got a comma before
→ ashurali    :THAT. This is the actual point that bewilders me.
→ ashurali    :Just regarding it as the THAT CLAUSE after NOTE
→ ashurali    :is OK (not caring about the comma).
→ ashurali    :I suddenly found that I also used a comma in my
→ ashurali    :first sentence here :p
→ chenzhishun1:i agree with you ^^
→ chenzhishun1:Note that... ==> Note ,$#^%$^,that... for example
→ chenzhishun1:Note,for the record,the violators will be
→ chenzhishun1:physically punished.
→ chenzhishun1:Note that ==> Note @$%@%@$, that... for example
→ chenzhishun1:Note at the end of this letter, Mr. Jones has
→ chenzhishun1:signed and agreed to the specific terms and
→ chenzhishun1:conditions.
→ chenzhishun1:i personally think using 2 commas is clearer than
→ chenzhishun1:using only ^^
→ chenzhishun1:one. Forgot to put a 'that' in the 2nd example :p
→ chenzhishun1:And the first one too :p What's going on with me?
推 ashurali    :You mentioned a very important concept that
→ ashurali    :punctuations were used for letting the meaning
→ ashurali    :clearer. Sometimes people just focus too much
→ ashurali    :on the grammar.
推 ashurali    :punctuations "were" used --> are
→ chenzhishun1:i couldn't agree with you more ^^