Re: [題目] 兩題單句填空(被動、助動)

[celestial09 (Koouos :D)]

※ 引述《suscym (DoDreamEr)》之銘言：
: 書名：新多益藍皮書
: 版本：初版
: 頁數：p.99 , p.103
: 題目：
:     (B) The name ____ on the check appears to be fraudulent, said the bank's
:         handwriting experts.
:         (A) writing
:         (B) written
:         (C) to write
:         (D) is written

write, wrote, written   3 tense.
                \\
                  this tense can also be used as 被寫

if you want to use "is written", you need to add "which"
=> The name which is writtne on the check....


: 疑問：由於自己從以前學英文有點壞習慣 有時文法題是靠感覺 但是真的要說為什麼就
:       不清楚了....為什麼不是D呢?(雖然唸起來怪怪的..)
:     (B) Even though Steve had been doing a good job, the company ___ afford to
:         pay his salary.
:         (A) wouldn't
:         (B) couldn't
:         (C) shouldn't
:         (D) may not
: 疑問：為什麼A不可以呢? 都是助動詞+V原型，語意上公司 不會/無法 付他薪水
:       感覺挺順的... 以上兩題請問大家了~

would, should, could.
  願     應      能

Steve 工作已經做得很好了 以邏輯推理 => 一定是因為不"能"支付他的薪水
                                      才會符合邏輯


: ---------------------------------------------------------------------
: ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
: ◆ From: 122.126.165.82
: ※ 編輯: suscym          來自: 122.126.165.82       (02/10 17:17)
: → priv        :第一個，一個句字不可以有兩個動詞吧                 02/10 17:19
: → priv        :第二句是無法負擔，所以是句意的問題                 02/10 17:19
: → priv        :如果沒有afford的話，就可以用wouldn't               02/10 17:19
: → priv        :回到第一句，written on check是分詞片語修飾主語     02/10 17:20
: → iwwe        :給大家一個思考方向,算是個trick,不管是現在完成/     02/10 19:34
: → iwwe        :過去完成,通常都會跟著一個"過去式"一起使用,原因     02/10 19:35
: → iwwe        :為何應該有人會知道..在這就不多說了:)               02/10 19:35
: → iwwe        :再者,一個未來式的使用,也會跟著一個"事實"(現在式)   02/10 19:39
: → iwwe        :我想這些"時間順序"的發生,需要多加強這些觀念        02/10 19:40

--
-TRUTH is the absolute Beauty embedded in mind-

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 123.193.24.253
→ ashurali    :The meaning of being able to has already been
→ ashurali    :express by the word AFFORD. It is not necessary
→ ashurali    :to use CAN AFFORD. Sometimes WILL AFFORD is also
→ ashurali    :OK. But I don't know why it was not allowed here.
→ ashurali    :Another question for the 1st one: Doesn't it need
→ ashurali    :past tense for the quotation without quotation
→ ashurali    :mark?