Re: [其他] 徐微廣告中的英文錯誤

[leon125 (里昂)]

看了一連串的連續劇~~
最後只有一個感想~~ It doesn't matter whether it is right or not .

只是有點想問  PO這篇文的用意為何~?

1.求證版友您的論述?
2.純分享您的研究報告?
3.提醒眾人別犯了文法錯誤?

另外要問的是，以下這句話，會不會讓人感到 好像是在找人家的.......

: 剛剛打電話去反應,小姐只能苦笑,說會反應給徐微,不知道她會不會真的反應.
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

我很感謝T老師的好意 跟 過去幫版友解答的熱忱
不過 也許表達方式上  再委婉一點 或許更好~~

--

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 59.112.80.206
推 Asaly       :T老師在這板常常找人吵架證明自己是對的
推 post91      :我也覺得原PO心態相當可議...若是今天只是要討論一句
→ post91      :話是對還是錯 何必要把"徐葳的廣告"講出來?
→ post91      :直接PO上該句子給大家討論不就得了?
→ post91      :感覺這樣的作法非常的有針對性 這樣就算原PO是對的
→ post91      :又如何? 讓人感覺就差了..
推 Asaly       :而且他也不一定對，也常常不太能接受別人提出的想法
→ Asaly       :大概也要有人要找個外籍老師說徐老師也是對的吧
推 post91      :語言本來就是習慣 根本沒有誰對誰錯的問題吧..冏
推 alarm123    :其實我覺得原po這精神不錯 不過應該要po在eng-class
→ chenzhishun1:i agree with post91 on this matter.
→ chenzhishun1:and i think tests like toeic are merely testing
→ chenzhishun1:common usages.
→ chenzhishun1:this way of analysis comes from an old style of
→ chenzhishun1:teaching that has been around for many decades
→ chenzhishun1:already.
→ chenzhishun1:they teach formulas and patterns, and reduce
→ chenzhishun1:English to merely a bunch of mechanic rules and
→ chenzhishun1:a way to please parents, teaches and bosses.
→ chenzhishun1:English is a tool/mode of communication.
→ chenzhishun1:It is not just some exams that we must pass.
→ chenzhishun1:It should be applied and used as much as possible