推 englebert :有分析大推 11/24 00:08
推 KiroKu :大推~ 11/24 00:16
推 goshfju :威 11/24 01:11
推 vivi0103 :推!!!! 11/24 11:22
推 trymybest :分析十分詳盡，謝謝！ 11/24 12:07
※ 引述《trymybest (不知道怎麼回事)》之銘言：
: P.63
: 例句：These desks remaining in the hall must be removed soon.
: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: 這個句子可以改寫成：
: These desks which are remaining in the hall must be removed soon.
: 或 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: These desks which remain in the hall must be removed soon.
: ^^^^^^^^^^^^
: Q:我的改寫有錯嗎？
: 請指教，謝謝！
All the sentences above are perfectly correct.
The only difference is that there is slightly difference in meaning.
I think I will NOT getting into describing the difference among them,
you shall base upon the definitiion of present and
present progression tense to feel its different.
The clauses "which are remaining in the hall" and
"which remain in the hall" are used to describe "desks",
therefore "which" or "which are" can be omitted in the sentence.
In conversational situation, it is usually omitted, but in written situation,
people like to let it stay to make the sentence clear for reading.
Incidentally, you can also replace "which" with "that".
BTW, if we try to use "present passive tense".
The entire sentence can be re-written as:
These desks which are left in the hall must be removed soon
Again, its meaning is still close to the original sentence,
but not exactly the same.
Why people use different tenses to describe "desks" ?
This all depends upon the situation they are in.
Using "present tense" is the most common.
Using "present progression tense" might be because they are removing stuffs,
and desks are one of the items in the place that removers are not sure
whether those desks need to be removed or not.
Using "present passive tense" might be they think
they are done with removing and find that desks are left behind.
In fact we can also use "past tense" as :
These desks that left in the hall must be removed soon.
以上
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 42.73.169.107