推 IsaacStein:我記得黑格爾是有區分的。 11/15 19:33
→ IsaacStein:只是不清楚是怎麼分的 ^^" 好像道德關於個人行為,而 11/15 19:33
→ IsaacStein:倫理則是社會關係吧? 11/15 19:33
→ IsaacStein:我個人的使用,是「不分」啦 XD 11/15 19:33
推 realove:嗯 我跟I一樣 不太去分 除非區分能有啥實益 11/15 19:36
推 julians:My own definition, to be moral is to follow, to be 11/16 12:48
→ julians:ethical is to choose and act 11/16 12:48
推 realove:I wondered how it is different from saying that to be 11/16 20:25
→ realove:ethical is to follow, to be moral is to choose and act 11/16 20:26
→ realove:? 呵 不是故意找碴 只是好奇而已.. 11/16 20:26
推 julians:恩,其實這應該是我算是自己的想法,一方面算是看到Zizek 11/17 11:08
→ julians:Alenka Zupancic等人去談Lacanian and Kantian ethical 11/17 11:08
→ julians:subject的想法;我的想法不太是morality and ethics互斥 11/17 11:08
→ julians:而是ethics同時包含了ethics and morality 11/17 11:09
→ julians:簡言之,對我而言,ethics同時強調了action, choice, and 11/17 11:09
→ julians:responsibility (as those ethics proposed by Kant, 11/17 11:10
→ julians:Lacan, Levinas, and Derrida);當然Lacan把act and desire 11/17 11:10
→ julians:的問題丟進來之後變的更複雜,不過我覺得也更加證明 11/17 11:13
→ julians:ethical subject是無時無刻都必須為自己的行為負責(因為 11/17 11:14
→ julians:永遠牽涉到unconscious desire) 11/17 11:14