看板 W-Philosophy 關於我們 聯絡資訊
sorry. but previous discussion lost me. why not go back to the quetion about 2-d semantics? this study group link might help people who are interested: http://www.uweb.ucsb.edu/~rabern/2D.htm quite a few papers listed can be found on those authors' personal websites. there should be enought stuff to start even one does not want to pay for a book. my first impression on 2-d semantics is it's kind of too ambitious to me. however, i just start reading about it. i probably haven't be able to see the magic. gook luck! (i apologize for not being able to type in chinese at this time.) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 146.96.81.26 ※ 編輯: yyla 來自: 146.96.81.26 (02/14 08:00)
realove:thanks mate i found the link quite helpful:) 02/14 08:08