[情報] 5/17 Q&A

[hsinhanchu (hsinhanchu)]

- Leopard 1 too weakly armored? "Don't play Leopard1" and "It was really nice
to troll whiners, knowing the armor thickness of this oversized light tank"
Leo-1的裝甲太薄了？
「不爽不要玩」
「看這些該該叫的笨蛋現在才知道這台超大輕坦的裝甲數據，潮好玩的咧」
註：Leo-1目前伺服器勝率55%，op rating在TXMT排第三，表現良好。

- the solution to nerf gold ammo pen and to increase its price was accepted,
because "we consider out approach to be correct"
決定nerf特種彈穿甲和調高售價的理由是「我們相信我們的方向是對的」。

- Q: "Since there are new (German) camos being introduced, havent you
thought about new inscriptions, such as 'Gott mit uns'?" A: "Yep. And 'Jedem
das seine' and 'Arbeit macht Frei'"
既然有新的德國迷彩，那有沒有新的標語，例如說「上帝與我們同在」？
「有啊，還有『人人接受他應得的(布根瓦爾德集中營門口標語)』和『勞動帶來自由』
(奧斯維辛集中營門口標語，那塊鐵牌前幾年還從博物館被偷走)』」

(個人評：Russian Bias，Gott mit uns沒有那麼有爭議性，只是毛子懶而已。)

- for now, there are no plans to change the upcoming Soviet tier 7 premium
medium tank into something on tier 8
目前不打算把快要上市的祖國T7金幣MT換成T8
(把T-44A寫出來這麼難嗎，毛子就是不乾脆)

- details about the patch 0.8.6: "Wait for patchnotes"
8.6請等正式公告。

- developers are not happy with the way the players communicate in game, it
is planned to "educate younger players" (Q: "And do you have plans to educate
children"? A: "Sure. Beating with belt and bread and water diet.") (SS: here,
SerB is trolling, but he also says that parents are responsible for bringing
up their children, it's not Wargaming's task to educate players to be polite)
開發組對玩家間溝通的模式很不滿，所以打算好好教育一下那些小屁孩玩家。
(問：所以你們有計畫了? 答：當然，鞭打之外只給他們吃麵包喝白開水。)
(SS：SerB只是在trolling，但是他也說過小孩的家教是家長的事，WG不負責)

- premium account won't be split into active and nonactive parts (SS: a
player suggested a hour-based premium account)
P帳不會分成啟動和非啟動狀態(有個玩家建議以小時計費)
(之前SerB似乎回答過一樣的問題，他的回應是「不然我們以秒計費怎麼樣？」)

- if you have an arty researched and it gets moved to another tier, both that
arty and the arty it gets replaced with will be unlocked (but not given)
8.6砲兵拉階後原階的新車和被調高的車都會解鎖，但是不會有免費新車。
（8.6不送車，這大概講三遍了）

- British arty will come in one of the following patches after 0.8.6
英國SPG會在8.6之後出。

- when you sell a tank with gold (permanent) camo, the amount of money you
get for selling it will be the same as if it didn't have any camo at all
賣掉有永久塗裝的戰車時，塗裝的價格不會回收。

- the decision not to make an arty hardcap was taken because of the
reluctance to introduce any hardcaps in general (SS: for those who still
think it's bullshit, there is a post on EU forums about what can happen when
hardcap goes wild...)
不增加SPG最大數量限制的原因是WG根本不想引入這種最大數量限制。
(前幾天Q&A有講，SPG有了之後玩家會開始要求LT cap、premium cap)
EU forum那篇的大意：如果這種系統設置出現，而WG對玩家的進一步要求退讓，
那最後可能每一場都要有同樣數目、同樣車階的同樣車種，想排到一場？乖乖等半小時。


- Q: "Why is S-51 so expensive and it gets nerfed so hard?" A: "Want justice?
Go to Hague tribunal."
為什麼S51這麼貴還被砍這麼慘？
「不爽告我啊。」

- Q: "Why was the Chinese 121 medium tank pen nerfed in 0.8.6 supertest?" A:
"We don't comment on rumors, leaks and other things causing butthurt."
為什麼121的穿甲在8.6PT被砍這麼慘？
「我們不回答謠言、洩漏消息和其他讓玩家小小心靈受傷的東西。」

- new methods of illegal mod detection won't be disclosed
有新的方法檢測違法模組，但是細節不透露。

- Storm will announce the artillery accuracy changes on monday (SS: funnily
enough, Storm specifically denied WG will mess around with shell gaussian
distribution for arty, so I really wonder what's going on)
Storm周一會公開說明SPG的準度改變。
(SS：很好玩的是，Storm特別指出WG不會去更動砲彈落點的高斯分布，所以我很好奇
究竟要怎麼改)

- according to SerB, the KV-1S with 152mm howitzer is not historical, the
pictures of KV-1S with a howitzer most likely show the version with a 122mm
gun
SerB表示KV-1S的152砲照片不是史實照片，那比較像是122砲。
(順帶一提KV-1S的D-2-5T是史實配置)

- Although Leopard 1 is technically a MBT, it's very specific - other MBTs
such as T-72 won't be introduced
雖然Leo-1在技術上是主力戰車沒錯，但是別的主力戰車例如說T-72是不會出現的。
(昨天有說，目前具備幾項特徵的戰車絕對不會出現：滑膛砲、複合裝甲、反應裝甲
、先進射控、燃氣渦輪)
(不過AMX-30可以期待一下。)

- OF-40 and similiar tanks won't appear in WoT
OF-40之類的戰車不會出現。

- 0.8.6 will come roughly in 3-4 weeks from now
8.6大概在3-4周之後會出現(應該是PT)

- Q: "Why is Jagdtiger not able to shoot enemies on 1 km distance as in real
life?" A: "Want realism? Join the army."
為什麼JT不能像真實世界一樣打一公里以外的目標？
「國軍人才招募中心歡迎你。」


- the L/70 on StuG III not having a muzzle brake is historical (SS:
historically, there was indeed a L/70 project "Ausf.H" to arm StuG III with
StuK 42. The superstructure however was quite different, "regular" StuG III
(even Ausf.G) wouldn't be able to carry it).
StuG III的75/70沒有砲口制退器是史實。
(SS：StuG III的確有安裝70倍徑的H型計畫，但是戰鬥室結構重新修整過)

- the "2S*" Soviet SPG's (SS: such as the 2S3 Akatsyia) won't appear in game
2S什麼碗糕的蘇聯自走砲不會有，想要玩鬱金香樹(2S4，240迫砲)、牡丹(2S7，203榴砲)
、風信子(2S5，152榴砲)的不用想了。

- dynamic objects on maps will be implemented ("when it's done it's done")
地圖上的動態物體WIDID

- there is no "biggest maps", 24 out of 34 maps have unified size: 1200x1200m
沒有「最大的那張地圖」，34張中的24張都是1.2*1.2km

- there will be other Sherman modifications (models) introduced into the game
會有其他的雪曼改型。

-  the small "bump" on the backside of the T-34 turret is a porthole for
firing crew infantry weapons
T-34砲塔後側的小型突起物是成員隨身武器射孔。

- when the T-34 driver's hatch is closed (as in the game), the driver IRL
cotrols the tank according to commander's directions
T-34的駕駛觀測窗關起來的時候是由車長指揮駕駛開車。

- the Japanese captured tanks in US tree have not been scrapped, they might
appear eventually
美國線的擄獲日本戰車沒有廢案，總有一天會做出來的。

- water has no influence on arty shell splash
水不影響SPG的爆風範圍(這個之前回答過)

--
30 second countdown, someone types the master plan:
"All the noobs rush the hill and the rest def"
random guy: "What is def ?"
"You, rush the hill..."

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 36.231.141.76
推 wert        :推~
→ wert        :感謝翻譯   辛苦了~
推 cklppt      :期待周一準度的解釋w
推 cklppt      :還有S-51跟同階比起來沒有特別貴阿 奇怪的問題
推 godfight    :Join the army 最好用的答案之一XD
推 t0042380    :感謝翻譯
推 korsg       :話說迫砲跟榴彈砲的差別在哪裡啊~?
推 TrueTears   :反正就是 不爽去海牙法庭告他 不然就是去加入軍隊 XD
推 Newtype     :感謝翻譯~
推 quarda      :真想問問有沒有螢火蟲饅頭...
→ ykes60513   :螢火蟲好像有說會裝 不過我想應該也會是金幣車吧??
推 Pegasus99   :原來地圖是1.2X1.2 我一直以為是一公里_(:3 」∠)_
→ udm         :真實世界的坦克到底能打幾公里遠的目標阿？
→ udm         :偵測拒離也不清楚是多遠.....
推 kingsmill   :海灣戰爭英軍有2km以上擊毀的戰例
推 ccc73123    :艾布蘭射程可以到3000M
→ vt1009      :2戰一千公尺以上擊毀紀錄常有
推 zaku7777    :一般實戰大概1.5km到2km,遠一點可以到4km.
→ zaku7777    :偵測距離大概是4km左右,這是90年代後期的戰車.
→ hsinhanchu  :螢火蟲不太確定會怎麼引進，目前有三說
→ hsinhanchu  :金幣車、租借法案線和砲塔TD線。我比較相信前兩種