[情報] 7/6 Q&A

[hsinhanchu (hsinhanchu)]

好玩的文章，關於日本高階輕坦的一些候選車種。作者是Soukoudragon，他和Kankou似乎
目前受WG委託研究日本線的樣子(? )

http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/06/japanese-high-tier-light-tanks/


=


http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/06/6-7-2013/


- in order for a little known (but real) tank to be implemented into the
game, the developers need the photos and projections (drawings, blueprints).
If there are no blueprints od drawings, developers will build it according to
available data
要把一台默默無名的真實戰車放到遊戲中，製作組需要照片和線圖/藍圖，如果沒有詳細
的線圖或藍圖，就只能照現有的資料去做。

- apparently, Russian players are moaning that they didn’t get some
events/free stuff for the US Independence Day
RU的玩家似乎在抱怨RU沒有因為美國獨立紀念日辦個活動或是給個禮品什麼的。

- there was a rumor that as a part of “free-to-win” business concept, some
premium tanks will be available for credits. It’s just a rumor, they won’t
– SerB explains that the premium tanks are for farming, not for winni
ng and the game model is “free to win”, not “free to farm”.
有個謠言是「因為WoT是不用付錢也能贏的遊戲，某些金幣車會可以用銀幣買。」
這純屬謠言，SerB表示金幣車是拿來賺錢，不是洗勝率用的，遊戲的概念是不付錢也能
贏，不是不付錢也可以大把賺遊戲幣。。
(Garbad：IS6有三個功能：賺錢、練組員和洗勝率，就我的駕駛經驗來看他是對的)


- dynamic tank characteristics in garage: “when it’s done it’s done”
車體性能在車庫內的動態顯示WIDID

- apparently, the T-44-122 indeed will be a part of the Soviet 2nd medium
branch, its appearance does not mean the regular T-44 loses its 122mm gun
T-44-122會是USSR MT第二線，這台車的出現不代表D-25-44T會從T44上被拔掉。

- apparently, SerB shares V.Putin’s idea that the breakup of USSR is nothing
worth celebrating
SerB認同普亭的說法：前蘇聯崩解並不是值得歡慶的事。

- apparently, Chaffee will be rebalanced just like the other tier 5 scouts
were (no guarantees about anything tho)
霞飛會和其他T5LT一樣被重新平衡(目前沒有任何保證)

- the developers do have the idea to unify WoWp and WoT clanwars via clan
consumables, such as “air strike”
開發組在思考以工會消耗品(例如「空襲」)的方式讓WoT和WoP的CW合併
(這啥毛，被空襲的一方開場先少10%HP之類的？)

- WoWp airplanes earn too little XP? “How terrible…”
WoP的經驗太難賺？
「好貼蘿蔔...」

- no plans to rebalance the WoT farming mechanism
不打算重新平衡WoT的賺錢機制。

- a player was complaining that when you train your crew for example from 75
skill to 100 skill for gold, the price is the same as if you train from 95
skill to 100 skill for gold and suggests the XP you pay for should transfer
to perks. SerB answers: “It doesn’t matter how well you for example can
drive – when you go to driving school, the price will be the same”
有個玩家抱怨(例如說)75%和95%的組員練成100%的價格一樣不公平，同時建議多的XP應該
變成技能經驗值。
「駕訓班不管你會不會開車，學費都收一樣。」

- if your T-50-2 crew had for example 75 skill, when it gets transferred, it
won’t automatically recieve 100 skill on MT-25, only the new crewmember
(radioman) is added with 100 skill
T-50-2轉MT-25的時候只有多出來的無線電手會是100%熟練，其他組員不會自動拉到100%


- althought the Ersatz Panther had the US stars painted on the front hull and
on the turret roof, according to WW2 photos, those won’t be added to the WoT
vehicle
二戰照片顯示偽M10在車體正面和砲塔頂都噴了美國白星，但是這不會放到遊戲中。


- Ersatz Panther metal sheets (“fake armor”) don’t act as spaced armor,
they are too thin for that
偽裝豹的外層偽裝鐵皮不是間隙裝甲，因為太薄，而且這已經回答過三次了。

- the fact that Ersatz Panther doesn’t have a muzzle brake is historical
偽裝豹沒有砲口制退器是史實設定

- the reason Ersatz Panther doesn’t have better camo factor than regular
Panther (despite the “camouflage”) is that this “disguise” didn’t work
in real life either, the tanks were spotted, recognized and destroyed
偽裝豹即使有偽裝，隱蔽系數並沒有比標準豹式好。原因是史實上這些偽裝沒有起作用，
偽裝成M10的豹式被識破且擊毀。

- new ingame soundtrack will slowly be added, according to the possibilities
of WG sound department
未來遊戲中的背景音樂會慢慢增加，看WG的音效部門工作狀況。

- the intended Panther rebalance is made to make the game more historical,
Panther mobility will remain the same, only unhistorical engines will be
removed
豹式的調整是為了讓遊戲更符合史實，不過豹式的機動性會保持一樣，只有非史實的
引擎會被拔掉。

- trollplatoons won’t be limited
不會限制Trollplatoon
(不能加個例如「擊毀比自己低四階或更多的友軍不算TK」之類的功能嗎)

- the WoWs multiturret mechanism has nothing to do with the WoT one (eg. WoWs
multiturret development won’d influence the WoT one)
WoS的多砲塔機制和WoT的多砲塔機制無關。

- the gold consumable reduced price (10k atm) is active only until 8.7 comes
out
到8.7版本為止金幣消耗品都會是半價

- SerB considers the situation where T10 mediums and TD’s penetrate T10 HT
frontal armor “normal”
SerB認為TXMT可以打穿TXHT正面裝甲很正常。

- the T-50-2 XP points will transfer to MT-25, T-50 XP points will transfer
to KV-1S
T-50-2的經驗會轉到MT-25上，T-50則會轉到KV-1S上。

- multiturret mechanism, bigger maps and historical battles are all planned
and will eventually be introduced
多砲塔機制、大型地圖和史實模式都計畫好了，總有一天會完工。

- E-25 price 7000g? “If the price seems too high to you, it of course means
the tank is not worth buying” (SS: in other words, it’s not just a test
price, it will stay probably)
E-25要價7000金？
「嫌貴就不要買。（SS認為這代表價格大概定下來了）」

- on his T-44, SerB uses wet ammo rack, rammer and stabilizer
SerB在他的T44上面裝VS、rammer和濕式彈藥架。

- no plans to reset player’s statistics
不打算讓玩家可以把戰績洗白。
(玩到破萬場就覺得新手債還起來很累.....)

- after your tank is destroyed in battle, on the damage panel all modules
appear as destroyed, even though ALL of them count as destroyed only during
ammorack explosion or drowning. This is so that players aren’t confused, why
some of their modules are not destroyed while their tank is dead
戰車被擊毀之後會顯示所有模組全毀，這是為了不讓玩家混淆為什麼戰車毀了但是某些
模組還在。
實際上，會全車模組全毀的狀況只有泡水或爆彈藥架。

- new Soviet medium branch starting from 8.9? “No comment”
USSRMT二線會在8.9？
「不予置評」

- for now, there is no candidate for tier 5 Soviet light tank
目前沒有適合的USSR T5LT。
(蘇聯其實不是很注重輕戰車的發展，缺車正常。)

- ingame FV4202 does correspond to real life data the developers have,
apparently there will be no FV4202 changes
FV4202的遊戲中數據和開發組手頭的資料一致，應該不會更動。

- FV4201 won’t appear in British medium branch, because it wasn’t a medium
tank
FV4201不會是UKMT，因為它不是MT。
(以英國自己的稱呼是通用戰車Universal Tank，以遊戲中應該會把FV215B取代掉或是
另闢一線HT，我個人認為會是前一種，因為FV215+120砲是非史實的設定)

- WoT: Generals will probably be available for mobile platforms too
WoT：將軍(WOT的卡片遊戲)會可以在隨身裝置上玩。

- you get a XP bonus by detracking the opponent, but not by destroying his
engine
斷履帶有助攻經驗，但是打爛引擎沒有。

- SerB states that WoWp balancing is better than it was in WoT, when WoT was
brand new
WoP目前的平衡比WoT剛出現的時候好很多。
(BF109Z OP)

- SerB states not so many people play WoWp, because WG doesn’t need crowds
of people to play WoWp at this stage, they are still testing stuff. When they
desire crowds, they will put more emphasis on PR. Generally, WG expects only
one fourth of players WoT have to play WoWp, because 3D space is more
problematic than 2D
SerB表示WoP的玩家目前不多，因為WG目前不需要這麼多玩家，有很多東西在測試中。
當需要玩家的時候，WG的公關部門就會開始工作。基本上WG預期25%的WoT玩家會玩WoP，
因為3D戰鬥比2D困難很多。


- fallen trees without leaves (on winter maps) don’t give any camo bonus
沒枝葉的樹即使撞倒也沒有隱蔽加成

--
Q: "Dear developers, does WoT generate so little profit that you have to
reduce the profitability of the tanks?"
A: "Dear players, do you play so bad that you have to imagine the
profitability drops all the time?"

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 36.231.138.149
推 r0930       :駕訓班比喻超好笑XD
推 doomhammer  :最後一個也好笑XD
→ doomhammer  :親愛的製作組哦,難道WoT不夠賺錢讓你們必需要減少坦
→ doomhammer  :克賺錢的效率?
→ doomhammer  :A: 親愛的玩家,難道你玩的這麼爛然後才幻想賺錢速度
→ doomhammer  :被修低了?    超嗆XDDD
→ doomhammer  :等一下  最後那個是簽名檔!?我中計了?
推 EddieWongF14:WoWP 跟本不行, 甭解釋了
推 melzard     :最後一項有指明是冬季地圖的樣子
推 ccc73123    :酋長的前裝甲才120mm 當重坦根本太薄~"~
推 ccc73123    :而且他的定位明明就是主戰坦克 跟豹1一樣 放重坦很怪
→ ccc73123    :我還是覺得百夫長2台合併 4202移到T9酋長T10比較合理
→ NanaMizuki  :Leo1會放進來是因為WG真的找不到車了
→ NanaMizuki  :不然理論上那個推出年代真的太後面了
推 ccc73123    :酋長跟豹1同年代的阿 服役年還比豹1晚1年
推 forever9801 :主戰坦克不夠強勢原因是血條的存在吧orz
→ r0930       :裝甲材質不一樣吧? WG又不可能把這個做出來
推 forever9801 :不做出來也不用其他方式補償 結果只在對自己有利的
→ forever9801 :地方說"符合史實" 在不符合的地方說"太複雜"
→ forever9801 :這本身就很有問題吧......
推 r0930       :嫌麻煩 大概XD
→ Alex21      :無法理解為何不限制trollplatoons…
推 wuchianlin  :現代坦克的設計思維本來就跟以前不一樣 很難分
→ hitlerx     :WOT的25%玩家會去玩WOP??....太高估了吧 2.5%差不多
→ qoopichu    :反正開發商愛怎麼講就怎麼講，玩家只能不爽不要玩
→ qoopichu    :雖然嘴砲了點，至少WG是很用心也很有良心的營運
推 batterykugua:SerB也是在T-44用這3樣裝備啊...
推 jeanvanjohn :背景音樂?(挖鼻孔，望向精美的兵長一米六音樂包)
推 doomhammer  :別這樣....原來的背景音樂也不錯啊打到緊張的時候能
→ doomhammer  :把氣氛帶出來
→ Fewer       :WOWP實在很難操控...
推 Pegasus99   :The Reluctant Heroes又要出來gank了=w=
推 ken80117    :酋長正面120mm沒錯，但是有72°，這種防護力很夠了
→ ken80117    :然後從來也沒聽過出Leo1是因為找不到車
→ ken80117    :以推出年代來說，M48上105mm M68更晚
推 abc12812    :WOWP玩家有99%是為了金幣吧 我先自首我就是
推 sleepcat612 :都有Leopard 1，法國的AMX-30怎麼就沒考慮做出來？
→ sleepcat612 :是因為沒有法國特色(裝彈機)?
→ ChinHuiTsao :所以豹式還是只能性騷擾了?
推 ccc73123    :豹1裝甲做這麼薄根本沒道理...雖然史實就是這麼薄
→ ccc73123    :可是冷戰的科技哪是二戰時能比的
推 Pegasus99   :現代坦克裝甲的確沒有像以前那麼厚啊 不過是拜新科技
→ Pegasus99   :所賜 而WOT不實裝新科技裝甲=w=
→ NanaMizuki  :Leo1不是復合裝甲
→ NanaMizuki  :酋長比Leo1晚一年 所以更不可能
→ NanaMizuki  :WG說過放Leo1已經是很特殊的情況
→ NanaMizuki  :不然不會考慮年代這麼後面的戰車
推 Pegasus99   :所以說豹一卡在舊式和新式之間 很可憐啊=w=
→ NanaMizuki  :M48上105只是車種平衡 引擎 車體都是A1的參數而已
→ NanaMizuki  :整體上來看根本不能稱呼M48A5
推 ccc73123    :不過其實T-62A也有弱化 不然遠本應該裝115mm滑膛砲
推 Pegasus99   :所以故意挑A1啊 A1仍然是用線膛炮
→ Pegasus99   :裝了滑膛炮才叫T-62
推 ccc73123    :其實T-62A用的是100mm滑膛砲 T-62是加大口徑而已
→ ccc73123    :T-62A只有小量生產
→ Pegasus99   :可是WOT wiki寫T-62A用的是rifled gun
→ hsinhanchu  :應該說62A是競標T62這個型號的其中一個設計案