看板 Wargaming 關於我們 聯絡資訊
So, according to the SEA server info, there is a transfer open from SEA to US. Vietnamese region only. 有SEA轉NA的活動。僅限越南地區。 - historically, the T-54 before T-62A is correct, there will apparently be no new tier 9 tank to replace the T-54 as a T-62 predecessor (it will stay as it is now) 史實中,T-54在T-62A之前是正確的。會維持原樣,不會做台新的九階車替換T-54 - the crew XP per battle value has an error (displays half of what it should be), it’s just an UI error (will be fixed) 組員每場經驗的顯示有bug(使顯示實際的一半),這是個界面的錯誤,會被修好 - it’s possible (but not guaranteed) that the “armor quality” modifier will return in historical battles (SS: for those who don’t remember, in very early WoT versions, there was a modifier that multiplied the armor by certain value, based on the armor quality: for example, regular armor had the value of 1, high quality mid-war RH German armor had the modifier of 1,1, making it effectively 10 percent thicker – it was removed, because it confused the players IIRC) 「裝甲品質」修正有可能(但不保證)會在史實模式中回歸。(SS: 以前德國裝有高品質 軋壓均質裝甲的車有裝甲值乘以1.1的修正係數;後來因為很多玩家搞不懂所以被刪掉了 ) - optional hulls are not guaranteed to appear as equal option to the usual hull: for example, T-54 could get two variants (first with more armor, the other lighter and faster), while second hull for T-34 will be better in all respects (more armor, better mobility) 可選車體不必然能完全取代原有車體;例如T-54有兩個改款(一個裝甲厚,一個較輕快) ,而T-34的新車體則是全面的提昇(裝甲和機動) - SerB states you turn “blue” by “systematically shooting your allies” 藍名代表以被系統判定為蓄意TK者(人人可誅之) - RU251 is still scheduled to be tier 8 German light tank, its balancing has not yet begun RU251仍然是預劃的八階的德國輕坦,但平衡未完成 - it’s possible there will be WoWp for iOS/Android (like WoT Blitz) too 戰機世界可能出行動版 - the Soviet tier 8 light tank is not yet ready, there are candidates however (SS: possibly the T-100, posted here at the end) 蘇聯八階輕坦還沒確定,但有些候選車了(SS: 可能是T-100) - all tanks get the same team distribution (SS: as in spend the same amount of battles on the top and bottom of the team) with one exception: arties 除了自走砲外,所有戰車分房的位置分佈都相同(不會永遠當班長或墊底) - WoT Generals will most likely not work on e-ink readers such as the Onyx Magellan 〈看不懂,好像不重要〉 - there are not enough data that would suggest the 75mm KwK 44 L/70 is more powerful than the 75mm KwK 42, that’s why they have idential performance in game. Its pen won’t be buffed (SS: yes, I tried to find some more data on that model, but there is very little indeed) 沒有足夠資料顯示75mm KwK 44 L/70比75mm KwK 42更強,所以他們在遊戲中表現都一樣 ,不會buff (SS: 我找過,資料很少) - there are apparently no curreng German historical candidates to replace unhistorical guns on some German tanks 部份德國戰車上虛構的砲,目前沒有可替代的史實砲 - there are no data from Bovington available on TOG-2R and TOG-3 projects Bovington 中沒有 TOG-2R 和 TOG-3 計畫的資料 - the reason the King Tiger had 120mm LFP in the first place (unhistorical) is that a part of data from Kubinka stated 100mm, another part stated 120mm, SerB states it’s completely possible different single vehicles had 120mm LFP 虎王一開始之所以有非史實的120mm 首下是因為 Kubinka 的資料有部份寫 100mm 另一部 份寫的是 120mm;SerB 表示很可能有一台120mm首下的特規車。 - Q: “Why is the commander’s copula on King Tiger 150mm thick instead of historical 120mm?” A: “Well, okay, since you ask, we will nerf it” Q: 為啥虎王的車長塔有150mm而不是史實的120mm?A: 好吧,既然你提了,我們會nerf它 - currently there are no plans for crew skill rework 沒打算重作組員技能 - two new mechanisms would have to be implemented for Strv 103 and other hydraulic suspension vehicles to appear 加入S戰車和其他液壓懸吊系統的車的話,要添加兩個新的運作機制。 - currently the mechanism where selecting a different gun would rename the tank based on its configuration is not developed (SS: for example – 75mm L/24: Panzer IV Ausf.D 75mm L/48: Panzer IV Ausf.G) 沒打算研發機制讓「車名會隨著主砲(構型)而更改」(SS: 例如四號裝75mm L/24→ Panzer IV Ausf.D;裝75mm L/48→Panzer IV Ausf.G) - the reason the tier 5 Panzer Sfl.IVc was implemented with its superstructure up is that it couldn’t move with the armor pulled down Panzer Sfl.IVc上部結構的鋼板沒有放下來是因為在這狀態下車不能動 http://truth.bahamut.com.tw/s01/201311/c2c566211a912ae3d57296a9097ff036.JPG
- Sturmtiger’s mortar shot was not modelled yet 突擊虎的臼砲還沒模組化 原文:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/18/18-11-2013/ -- In church, they say to forgive! Forgiveness is between them and God; it's my job to arrange the meeting. 《 Man on Fire 》 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.45.232.160
julyjungle :0.0/ 早阿 11/19 11:03
sipaz :虎王躺著中槍 11/19 11:04
aa00245 :WoT Generals 是卡牌遊戲 11/19 11:05
aa00245 :虎王的車長塔那個也太好說話了吧 11/19 11:06
julyjungle :可變車體不會是兩個完全對等的車體,舉例來說:... 11/19 11:06
garrodx :「大家都聽到了,是玩家自己要我們nerf虎王的」... 11/19 11:41
KINGTIGERX :因為是德國車,當然好說囉 11/19 11:47
donkilu :虎王gg...砲塔高階場已經被打好玩了還nerf... 11/19 12:16
colin1120 :我上次用AT8頂砲朝虎王各種地方各種彈藥打了二十來發 11/19 12:23
colin1120 :其中車長蓋應該有八九發 AP彈HE彈無所不試 11/19 12:23
colin1120 :結論:那是我第一次後悔沒帶金彈 11/19 12:24
acebruce :如果是蘇聯車做太厚他們會說:這是遊戲平衡不是模擬器 11/19 12:24
b97505048 :那卡片遊戲好像是免費的 但都找不到載點... 11/19 12:37
Pegasus99 :虎王車長塔剛buff 說要nerf很明顯是troll人=w= 11/19 12:41
Pegasus99 :祖國線不是輕坦資料很難找嗎? 想辦法先解決T7吧 11/19 12:44
Pegasus99 :還有可憐的RU251 到底有沒有借到車子量數據啦wwww 11/19 12:45
lsslss :虎王車長塔BUFF前是80mm 所以下修到120mm不無可能 11/19 12:47
Pegasus99 :喔喔 這下搞笑了=w= 為什麼原本只有80啦!!!!! 11/19 12:50
Pegasus99 :所以史實120被放置play兩次_(:3 」∠)_ 11/19 12:51
lsslss :模型上也有BUFF http://i.imgur.com/reK57a7.png 11/19 12:57
tai33ru :別這樣...IS-3都被Nerf了OAQ 以前連後腦都有機會彈 11/19 13:56
tai33ru :RU 251好像是根本沒辦法確定有沒有那兩台車 11/19 13:57
tai33ru :甚至那兩台車說不定不是RU 251... 11/19 13:57
lsslss :RU-251 實車不知道丟哪去了www 11/19 13:59
tai33ru :一個說資料上有但是實地沒有 一個館方不給看www 11/19 14:02
lsslss :不給看的搞不好也是弄丟了www 11/19 14:03
victor0lynn :哦哦哦!!德國LT耶!!!可以給個8.8砲嘛? 11/19 14:03
tai33ru :v大人家拿90mm喔 >/< 11/19 14:11
victor0lynn :難道是豹式那管嘛? 11/19 14:14
victor0lynn :說錯~印度豹那管 11/19 14:14
tai33ru :史實好像是裝M47巴頓的M36 90mm 確切我不確定:P 11/19 14:22
victor0lynn :我查了一下 極速80耶.............................. 11/19 14:43
victor0lynn :http://ppt.cc/YJn9 11/19 14:43
victor0lynn :看起來是豹1(PTA)車體 500馬力 這台做成LT好像太OP了 11/19 14:47
tai33ru :不是PTA車體喔 PTA是七對路輪 RU251只有五對 11/19 14:52
victor0lynn :對耶 可能對應噸數 懸吊有改 11/19 15:11
tai33ru :不過長的倒是真的蠻像的0.0 11/19 15:17
lsslss :RU-251 整體設計可以視為迷你豹一 當然武裝也有變弱 11/19 15:36
lsslss :不過90砲對輕坦而言還是很威就是 11/19 15:37
forever9801 :德系裝甲x1.1 官方:小學算術太複雜捨去 11/19 20:26
forever9801 :虎王車長蓋太厚 官方:感謝提醒我們會nerf他 11/19 20:27
forever9801 :KV-1S 122砲太OP Serb:我說不准nerf就是不准nerf 11/19 20:28
hitlerx :我也覺得那句是troll...不過萬一真nerf也不意外啦 11/19 21:18