[情報] 1/26 1/27 Q&A

[tai33ru (磁磚大)]

第二篇


Q&A 1/26

- Storm states that there are no confirmed reports on Hidden Village FPS drops

Storm表示目前沒有確切的報告顯示日本地圖的FPS有偏低的問題。

- Storm confirms: the tier 8 Soviet premium medium candidate is the light T-54

Storm確認了新的蘇聯八階金中坦候選車是輕量版T-54。
（譯：T-54 model 1949 http://goo.gl/8YrdVx）

- Storm states that the FOV changes in the 8.11 test are how it’s supposed
to be – the FOV until now was “not correctly made and we got used to it”

Storm表示現在8.11測試中FOV的改變是正確的樣子，而目前的FOV是不正確的，只
是玩家已經習慣他了。

- developers fixed the bug where some 8.10 visual camo patters (SS: notably
the Soviet summer ones) look too “washed out” – he is however not sure
whether this fix will make it to 8.11

開發組已經修正了8.10永久迷彩圖案（SS：特別指蘇聯的夏季迷彩），他過去看起來太「
乾淨了」，但是他不確定會不會在8.11推出修正。

- apparently, SerB believes Chi-Ri was inspired by Germans (SS: ….which is
true I think, gotta ask though)

SerB相信チリ是受到德國坦克（譯：據稱是豹式）的啟發。（SS：……似乎是真的，再問
問。）

- Chi-Ri based TD in WoT? “No comment on future branch development”

推出以チリ為基礎發展的TD的可能性？「無可奉告，下一位。」

- even after the 8.11 upgrade, the WoT engine will be different from the one
in WoWp

在8.11的升級之後，WOT的引擎會跟WOWp不同。（譯：最新的ASAP有提到。）

- developers are not commenting on what’s going on on Chinese servers (the
Chinese can actually buy the VK7201 for 200 USD or so), Chinese business
model is independent on Wargaming

開發組對中國服沒有評論（中國服可以用約200美金的價買到VK7201，）（譯：6000台幣
，大約四台金幣八階重），中國方面的營運模式跟WG沒關係。

- SerB states, that the garage battles for tier 10 tanks only is “one of the
variants” – it’s not sure yet how many tanks will be required to be in
your garage for such a battle, SerB will have a look at the statistics to
see, how many tanks does an average player have in garage

SerB表示給十階怪物們的車庫戰將會是「其中一種變形」，目前還不確定一場戰鬥中你會
需要多少戰車。SerB會看看數據，瞧瞧一名表現在平均值的玩家車庫裡會有多少車。

==============================================================================

Q&A 1/27

- for now it is not planned to change vehicle characteristics between random
battles and upcoming historical battles (SS: as in, if you have a Panzer IV
in certain setup, its characteristics will be the same in both modes, if you
use the same modules)

目前沒有計畫改變坦克在隨機戰鬥和歷史戰中的車體性能。（SS：意思是如果你的四號用
同樣的配置，在隨機戰跟歷史戰中的性能會是一樣的。）

- the recent interface upgrades were not done earlier, because “other
interface works had to be completed before”

目前的遊戲介面升級不會更快完成，因為還有其他的介面升級需要先做完。

- the probability of causing minimum and maximum damage is not linear –
 there is a lower chance to cause extreme end damage and higher chance to
cause average damage.

造成的傷害值機率並非線性的，機制是造成極端傷害的機會較低而接近平均傷害的機會較
高。（譯：簡而言之，比較接近常態分佈）

- regarding one nation being better than other in “national battles”: “A
nation as a whole isn’t worse, actual tanks are. These tanks will be fixed,
if necessery”

在國別戰中，有國家可能會比其他國家強的話怎麼辦？「以國家為整體的話並不會造成極
端情況，各別坦克才會，如果必要，我們會平衡這些坦克。」

- (SS: in 8.11, the teamkill and teamdamage bans will be much harsher) –
 regarding the fear of unjust bans for random hits, SerB states: “We will
not ban for random hits on allies”

（SS：8.11中，擊傷或急殺友軍的判定會更嚴格）那麼會不會不小心誤傷友軍就被Ban怎
麼辦？SerB：「如果是這樣，我們不會Ban的。」
（譯：說的輕鬆寫意，怎麼判定……）

- Storm states regarding the differences between gaps between roadwheels on
T-54, Type 59 and WZ-120 in 8.11 that they are different hulls, these gaps don
’t have to be the same

Storm表示T-54、Type-59跟WZ-120的路輪間距在8.11會因為車體不同的關係，間隙不必相
同。

- Storm states there will be no compensations for Type 59 changes

Storm說Type-59更動不會有補償。（譯：除了改變車體外觀還有什麼嗎？）

- Type 59 was changed “so that the tanks based on T-54 were done correctly”

Type-59變更，「如此一來以T-54為基礎發展的坦克們更加完美了！」

- the T-54 in the game from 8.11 will be “early hull variant”

T-54在8.11中將會變成「早期車體的衍生型」。

- IS-3 mantlet was not changed (SS: some player was complaining it is now too
easy to penetrate)

IS-3的炮盾沒變。（SS：有玩家抱怨現在那裏變太好穿了）

Funnily enough, a player submitted his “M6A2E1 sucks” whine in verses. SerB
’s only answer was “Not a Pushkin”

留最後一個典故我不知道XDDD
總之SerB又Troll人了，又一個抱怨M6A2E1的傢伙


原文網址：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/26/26-1-2014/
          http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/27/27-1-2014/

--
推 oXnXo:按著開機鍵數秒即可達到關燈的效果
→ cypher4444:樓上我差點照做了!!! 這樣很危險阿!!
→ yuan860721:還好樓上你沒按 想想不久以前 我就照他的話做了之後阿
→ cypher4444:就怎樣@@
→ yuan860721:就關機了阿..............
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 106.65.33.249
推 ccc73123    :日本地圖真的很LAG...
→ tomwei34    :可能是指俄國詩人普希金，不過我不知道那啥意思...XD
推 fransice7   :造成的傷害值機率 官方回答好像也不完全對
→ fransice7   :你像是KV-2 152mm那種應該打HE的砲,拿去打AP彈
→ fransice7   :只要有打穿,傷害幾乎都會趨近於最大值
推 OnlyTD      :辛苦推
推 fireunicorn :t54輕量版該說是弱化版...但感覺比t44還強喔
裝甲弱化但是炮似乎跟Type-59一樣 機動性尤甚之..我的背後 怎麼有點涼意(抖

推 cklppt      :FoV同上篇推文
改囉 感謝~

→ hitlerx     :最後一個我看百度是說...有人寫了首詩來形容那台車爛
推 wahaha5678  :原來如此XDD
→ hitlerx     :(即M6A2E1) 然後Serb的評論意思應該是不如Pushkin
→ hitlerx     :Pushkin可能是一個毛子詩人或是被不少毛子喜歡的詩人
是俄國詩人普希金沒錯 不過也是因為SS沒放詩 所以我就跳過了XDDD
※ 編輯: tai33ru         來自: 106.65.33.249        (01/30 00:55)
推 BUMAS       :應該會放在8階吧..有必要買一台阿
→ lsslss      :@fransice7 你HE彈"貫穿"的時候也是滿傷+-25%
→ lsslss      :傷害不到一半是因為"沒貫穿"所以"傷害"會先打"對折"
→ lsslss      :還要在算裝甲厚度 兩個削減下來傷害頂多剩3~4成左右
推 qoopichu    :紙老虎要被105雪曼洗臉了嗎
推 fransice7   :原來如此 ... 之前我都搞不清楚HE傷害~_~"